Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNugroho, Yusuf Sulistyo
dc.contributor.authorGunawan, Dedi
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-05T02:13:29Z
dc.date.available2016-08-05T02:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01
dc.identifier.citationBarros, R. C., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F., & Freitas, A. A. (2015). Decision-Tree Induction. In Automatic Design of Decision-Tree Induction Algorithms (pp. 7–45). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14231-9. Deshpande, S. ., & Thakare, V. . (2010). Data Mining System and Applications: A Review. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 1(1), 32–44. http://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2010.1103. Eriksson, M., Forslund, A.-S., Jansson, J.-H., Soderberg, S., Wennberg, M., & Eliasson, M. (2016). Greater decreases in cholesterol levels among individuals with high cardiovascular risk than among the general population: the northern Sweden MONICA study 1994 to 2014. European Heart Journal, (March 2, 2016), 0–7. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw052.. Farnadi, G., Sitaraman, G., Sushmita, S., Celli, F., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., De Cock, M. (2016). Computational personality recognition in social media. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 26(2), 109–142. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-016-9171-0. Heruna, T., & Anita, R. (2014). Data Monitoring Of Student Attendance At Bina Nusantara University Using Control Charts. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 4(4), 23–31. Retrieved from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-4 Issue-4/Version-3/E04432331.pdf. Kotsiantis, S. B. (2013). Decision trees: A recent overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 39(4), 261–283. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4. Manek, A. S., Shenoy, P. D., Mohan, M. C., & Venugopal, K. R. (2016). Aspect term extraction for sentiment analysis in large movie reviews using Gini Index feature selection method and SVM classifier. World Wide Web, 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-015-0381-x. Mills, E. J., Rachlis, B., Wu, P., Devereaux, P. J., Arora, P., & Perri, D. (2008). Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Mortality and Events With Statin Treatments: A Network Meta-Analysis Involving More Than 65,000 Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52(22), 1769–1781. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.039. Raileanu, L. E., & Stoffel, K. (2004). Theoretical comparison between the Gini Index and Information Gain criteria. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 41(1), 77–93. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:AMAI.0000018580.96245.c6. Schouten, K., Frasincar, F., & Dekker, R. (2016). An Information Gain-Driven Feature Study for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (pp. 48–59). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73351-5. Suknovic, M., Delibasic, B., Jovanovic, M., Vukicevic, M., Becejski-Vujaklija, D., & Obradovic, Z. (2012). Reusable components in decision tree induction algorithms. Computational Statistics, 27(1), 127–148. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-011-0242-8. Ting, K. M. (2010). Precision and Recall. In C. Sammut & G. I. Webb (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (p. 781). Boston, MA: Springer US. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_652. Viikki, K., Juhola, M., Pyykkö, I., & Honkavaara, P. (2001). Evaluating training data suitability for decision tree induction. Journal of Medical Systems, 25(2), 133–144. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005624715089. Yang, L., Dang, Z., & Fischer, T. R. (2011). Information gain of black-box testing. Formal Aspects of Computing, 23(4), 513–539. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00165-011-0175-6.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2477-3328
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7481
dc.description.abstractCholesterol is a soft, yellow, and fatty substance produced by the body, mainly in the liver. Every day, liver produces about 800 milligrams of cholesterol which is derived from animal products, seafood, milk, and dairy products. At normal levels, cholesterol is useful for health, because it is one of the essential fats required by the body for cell formation. Meanwhile, cholesterol levels are classified into three categories: normal, high, and low. The cholesterol levels can be affected by several factors that are sometimes not widely known by common people. The objective of this study was to determine the level of significance of each factor that affects cholesterol levels and to find the value of accuracy, precision and recall of the algorithms used in decision tree induction. The selection criterions used were the information gain, gini index and gain ratio to find the level of significance of the factors that affect cholesterol levels. Variables that affect cholesterol levels divided into four types, namely gender, age, history of smoking, and history of diabetes. The result showed that the most influence factors on cholesterol levels based on training data processed using three algorithms was the history of diabetes. Meanwhile, the highest accuracy was obtained by the information gain which was 56.14%. The recall values were distributed evenly for all three algorithms, it indicated the equality of those three algorithms. The information gain and the gain ratio had equal precision values (57.58%), however, they had higher precision in compared with the gini index. In contrast, the gain ratio was higher than the information gain and the gini index concerning with the RMSE of 0.564in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectcholesterol levelsin_ID
dc.subjectdecision treein_ID
dc.subjectgain ratioin_ID
dc.subjectgini indexin_ID
dc.subjectinformation gainin_ID
dc.titleDecision Tree Induction for Classifying the Cholesterol Levelsin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record