dc.contributor.author | Margana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-18T06:03:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-18T06:03:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brown, G. and G. Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and Discourse: a Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge. Finch, G. (2000). Linguistic Terms and Concepts. London: Mac Millan Press Ltd. Finnegan, E., Blair, D. & Collin, P. (1997). Language: Its Structure and Use. 2nd Ed. Australia: Harcourt Brace& Co. Grundy, P. (2008). Doing Pragmatics. London: Hodder Education. Horn, L.R. and G. Ward. (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher. Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lihui, Z. & Jianbin, H. (2010) A Study of Chinese EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Failure and the Implications for College English Teaching. Polyglossia Vol. 18, February 2010. Mey, J.L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Massachusetts: Best-set Typesetter Ltd. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | in_ID |
dc.identifier.issn | 0852-9604 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/7539 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper deals with promoting knowledge of pragmatics which focuses
on the knowledge of the illocutionary acts and conversational implicatures to
students of English education and English literature study program. It is aimed
at describing types of illocutionary acts, illocutionary forces, and conversational
implicatures in the context of undergraduate thesis examination. Such types of
knowledge of the illocutionary and implicatures are great importance for those
students as it confers a clear description of use of speech acts in the context of
the undergraduate thesis examination. In reference to these issues, students of
English education and English literature study program should be familiar with
fi ve types of illocutionary acts which include (1) representatives, (2) directives,
(3) commissive, (4) expressive, and (5) declarative. Besides, they are encouraged
to clearly understand the nature of the illocutionary forces of each illocutionary
act which guides them to make sense of the intentions as performed in the
illocutionary act. Added to this, knowledge of conversational implicatures used
in undergraduate thesis examination should be clearly understood. The types of
implicatures include generalized conversational implicatures and particularized
conversational implicatures. This suggests that students who are going to defend
their undergraduate thesis draft should be well-prepared and familiar with the
types of illocutionary forces and conversational implicatures in order that misconception
and mis-interpretation of speech acts employed by examiners can be minimized. | in_ID |
dc.language.iso | en | in_ID |
dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | in_ID |
dc.subject | Speech Acts | in_ID |
dc.subject | Illocutionary Acts | in_ID |
dc.subject | Illocutionary Forces | in_ID |
dc.subject | Implicatures | in_ID |
dc.title | Promoting Pragmatics Knowledge to Students of English Education and English Literature Study Program to Face an Undergraduate Thesis Examination | in_ID |
dc.type | Article | in_ID |