Show simple item record

Kesesuaian Alat Ukur Triase Metodelabeling dan Australian Triage Scalemodifikasi di IGD RSI Pekajangan

dc.contributor.authorWirotomo, Tri Sakti
dc.contributor.authorEmaliyawati, Etika
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-22T09:16:52Z
dc.date.available2016-10-22T09:16:52Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-27
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian College for Emergency Medicine. (2012). Policy on The Australasian Triage Scale. https://www.acem.org.au/.../Policy-on- the-Austral... Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. (2013). Guidelines on The Implementation of The Australasian Triage Scale in Emergency Department. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. Bullard, M. J., Unger, B., Spence, J., & Grafstein, E. (2008). Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. Cjem, 10(2), 136-151. Calder, S., & Platz, E. (2014). Triage systems. Emergency Department Leadership and Management: Best Principles and Practice, 203. Chi, C. H., & Huang, C. M. (2006). Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triage System in predicting resource utilization. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 105(8), 617- 625. Christ, M., Grossmann, F., Winter, D., Bingisser, R., & Platz, E. (2010). Modern triage in the emergency department. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 107(50), 892. Dahlan, M. S. (2013). Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel dalam Penelitian Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Ed. 3. Jakarta : Salemba Medika. Dahlan, M. S. (2013). Statistik untuk Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Ed. 5. Jakarta : Salemba Medika. Data Rekam Medik. (2015). Rumah Sakit Islam PKU Muhammadiyah Pekajangan Pekalongan. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2007). Pedoman Teknis Penanggulangan Krisis Kesehatan Akibat Bencana (Mengacu pada Standar Internasional). Jakarta : Departemen Kesehatan RI. Department of Health and Ageing-Australian. (2007). Emergency Triage Education Kit. Dharma, K. K. (2011).MetodologiPenelitianKeperawatanPan duanMelaksanakandanMenerapkanHasilPenel itian.Jakarta : Trans Info Media. Emergency Nurses Association. (2011). Triage Qualifications.https://www.ena.org/.../TriageQ ualifications.pdf. Fernandes, C., Tanabe, P., Gilboy, N., Johnson, L. A., McNair, R. S., Rosenau, A. M., ... & Suter, R. E. (2005). Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 31(1), 39-50. Fitzgerald., Gerald., Jelinek., George., Scot., Deborah, A., Gerddtz., Marie, F. (2009). Emergency Department triage Revisited. Emergency Medicine Journal Forero, R. (2012). Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) literature review on the Australasian triage scale (ATS) (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales). Gilboy, N. (2005). Sheehy’s Manual of Emergency Care. Sixth Edition. Edited by Newberry, L., & Criddle, L.M. St.Louis, Missouri : Mosby Elsevier. Gilboy, N. (2010). Sheehy’s Emergency Nursing Principles and Practice. Sixth Edition. Edited by Howard, P.K., & Steinmann, R.A. St.Louis, Missouri : Mosby Elsevier. Gilboy, N., Tanabe, T., Travers, D., & Rosenau, A. M. (2011). Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A triage tool for emergency department. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://www. ahrq. gov/professionals/systems/hospital/esi/esi1. html. Gräff, I., Goldschmidt, B., Glien, P., Bogdanow, M., Fimmers, R., Hoeft, A., ... & Grigutsch, D. (2014). The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria–first assessment of validity and reliability. PloS one, 9(2), e88995. Health Policy Priorities Principal Committee. (2011). Australian Triage Process Review Jenkins, J. L., McCarthy, M. L., Sauer, L. M., Green, G. B., Stuart, S., Thomas, T. L., & Hsu, E. B. (2008). Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehospital and disaster medicine, 23(01), 3-8. Jevon, P., & Ewens, B. (2009). Pemantauan Pasien Kritis. Jakarta : Erlangga. Jones, K. M., Marsden, J., Windle, J. (2006). Emergency Triage Manchester Triage Group. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Kartikawati, D., (2011). Buku Ajar DasarKeperawatanGawatDarurat. Jakarta: PenerbitSalembaMedika. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2008). Nomor 129/Menkes/SK/II/2008. Tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Rumah Sakit. Kemenkes R.I. Jakarta. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Nomor 856/Menkes/SK/IX/2009. Tentang Standar Instalasi Gawat Darurat (IGD) Rumah Sakit. Kemenkes R.I. Jakarta. Lee, J. Y., Oh, S. H., Peck, E. H., Lee, J. M., Park, K. N., Kim, S. H., & Youn, C. S. (2011). The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 19, 68. Mace, S. E., & Mayer, T. A. (2008). Triage. In : Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Elsevier Ministry of Health, NSW. (2011). Mass Casualty Triage Pack-Smart Triage PackNotoatmodjo, S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. Olofsson, P., Gellerstedt, M., & Carlström, E. D. (2009). Manchester Triage in Sweden– Interrater reliability and accuracy. International Emergency Nursing, 17(3), 143- 148. Oman, K. S., McLain, J. K., & Scheetz, L. J. (2008). Panduan Belajar Keperawatan Emergensi. Jakarta : EGC. Parenti, N., Manfredi, R., Reggiani, M. L. B., Sangiorgi, D., & Lenzi, T. (2010). Reliability and validity of an Italian four-level emergency triage system. Emergency Medicine Journal, 27(7), 495-498. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2007). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot William & Wilkins. Ranse, J., & Zeits, K. (2010). DISASTER TRIAGE. International Disaster Nursing, 57. Russell, R. (2011). Triage. In Ryan's Ballistic Trauma (pp. 199-206). Springer London. Standar Prosedur Operasional Triase IGD. (2013). Rumah Sakit Islam PKU Muhammadiyah Pekajangan Pekalongan. The Western Australian Centre for Evidence Informed Healthcare Practice.(2011). Triage In The Emergency Department Usman, Husaini & Setiady, P. (2006). Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Van Veen, M., & Moll, H. A. (2009). Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. children, 6, 17. Wulp, I. (2010). Reliability and Validity of Eemergency Department Triage Systems.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7822
dc.description.abstractTriage is a system which function to select the patient based on the level of the emergency of medical service thus all the patients are attended according to the priority. Triage system available in the PKU Islamic MuhammadiyahPekajangan Hospital is labelling triage method. The regulation to apply the modified Australian Triage Scale (ATS) method is present with the consideration of the detail in each emergency level and easier to use. Based on the situation, it is needed to conduct a study to know the appropriateness the modified ATS with the labelling triage method in evaluating and determining the level of emergency of the patient so that the patient could be saved. This study was aimed to know the appropriateness between thelabelling triage method with the modified ATS in measuring the emergency level of the patient. Observational with cross sectional study design was occupied for this study using convenient sampling technique on 38 respondents with various cases done by the nurses in the Emergency Room. Statistical analysis used in this study were Wilcoxon to know the difference, Rank Spearman’s to know the correlation and Kappa test to know the appropriateness of those instruments. The results of the Wilcoxon test showed p value the labelling triage method and modified ATS the first observer is 1.000 (>0.05) and the second observer is 0.317 (>0.05). The results of the Rank Spearman’s test showed the labelling triage method and modified ATS the first observer is 1.000 (p value = 0.000; <0.05) and the second observer is 0,981(p value = 0.000; <0.05). The results of the Kappa test showed the labelling triage method and the modified ATS the first observer is 1.000 (p value = 0.000; <0.05) and the second observer is 0.953 (p value = 0.000; <0.05). Based on the results of this study, both triage instruments showed no difference in assessment results, there is the strong correlation and very good agreement. Both triage instruments showed the same range and meaning, thus it can be concluded that the modified ATS method can be used in the Emergency Room of the PKU Islamic MuhammadiyahPekajangan Hospital because have appropriateness with the labelling triage method.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherSTIKES Muhammadiyah Pakijanganin_ID
dc.subjectTriage Labellingin_ID
dc.subjectEmergency Roomin_ID
dc.subjectAustralian Triage Scalein_ID
dc.titleKesesuaian Alat Ukur Triase Metodelabeling dan Australian Triage Scalemodifikasi di IGD RSI Pekajanganin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
MIPA DAN KESEHATAN_65.pdf
Size:
273.1Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record