dc.contributor.author | Rahmawaty, Setyaningrum | |
dc.contributor.author | Hidayati, Listyani | |
dc.contributor.author | Kurnia, Pramudya | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-30T01:14:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-30T01:14:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Griffin, P. & Nix, P. 1991. Educational assessment and reporting: A new approach. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Fajar, A. 2005. Portofolio dalam Pelajaran IPS. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung Johnson & Elaine, B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and learning: What is and why it’s here to stay. United State of America: Corwin Press, In. Popham, W. J. 1998. Classroom Assessment: What teacher need to know. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. 1985. Sistematic Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Syamsuddin A.R. & Vismaia S. D. 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Kerja sama Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dengan PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung. Toomey Ron, Judith Chapman, Junet Gaff, Jaqueline McGilp, Mauree Walsh, Elizabeth Warren & Irene Williams. 2004. Lifelong learning and the assessment and evaluation practice in some Australian Faculties of Education. Journal of in-servie Education, vol 30; 2: 225-243. | in_ID |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-979-118824-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/8003 | |
dc.description.abstract | A good design to evaluate students learning is highly important in measuring students
performance and the acquisition of the basic competence. The design must be developed based
on the consideration that condition of learning and different learning objectives demand
different methods of evaluation. Many teachers have ignored such a consideration, thus resulted
in invalid and unreliable evaluation. For that reason, a portfolio evaluation is introduced. As a
series of evaluation activites, portfolio is carried out based on the relation between the learning
objectives and standard competence in every subject matter. In such, it is expected that the
students achievement will improve, and so is the acquisition of lifelong learning skills. In a
portfolio, the products of students learning process are compiled through several evaluation and
revision cycles. Student’s final score consisted of a portfolio score, a final examination score,
and a laboratory work score with the ratio of 40, 30, and 30. The portfolio score consists of
score on several aspects, i.e., completeness, tidiness, selected assignments, requaired
assignments, as well as oral test. The final score results were compared to the conventional
model of evaluation which considered only the score of the final examination and the score of
laboratory work with the ration of 70 and 30. The results of the study indicated that the portfolio
evaluation is better in demonstrating the students achievement than the conventional model. | in_ID |
dc.language.iso | id | in_ID |
dc.subject | learning evaluation development | in_ID |
dc.subject | portfolio | in_ID |
dc.subject | competence | in_ID |
dc.title | Model Evaluasi Portofolio Untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Dietisien dan Lifelong Learning | in_ID |
dc.type | Article | in_ID |