Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManurung, Yayuk Hayulina
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-04T00:37:41Z
dc.date.available2017-07-04T00:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-04
dc.identifier.citationBall, D., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511 Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical Information Literacy: Implification for Instructional Practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 32 (2) p. 192-199 Kramsch, C. (2008). Language and Culture. China: Oxford University Press. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections between Campus Courses and Field Experienc- es in College and University Based on Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education 61 (2) p 123- 127 Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Intrapersonal Communication and Internalization in the Second Language Classroom. In Alex Kozulin et al (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 349-370). New York: Cambridge University Press. Violet, S.E & G. Ang. (2012). Culturally Mixed Group on International Campuses: An Opportunity for Inter-Cultural Learning. Journal of Higher Education Research and Development 31 (1) p 21-37 Setiawan, W. (2012). Development of Personal Learning Network System to Build E-Literacy. International Journal of Computer Science. 9 (2) p 114- 120 Cruickshank, et al., 2006 Harmer, 2004. p 221 Kirsch & Jungeblut, 2005 Winoto, 1994 Research Program for International Student Assessment (PISAin_ID
dc.identifier.issn2549-5607
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/8847
dc.description.abstractThe students of university supposed to be the agents of change seem still having a lot of efforts to make it happen. The fact found that their cultural literacies are still in need of improvement. This study was aimed to review how far the students’ cultural literacy in English Departments of University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara was. The data collection technique used was direct observation technique by researchers, discussion through Focused Group Discussion (FGD) and indirect observation through questionnaires and equipped with library research. The results of analysis and processing data showed that students’ cultural literacy was dominated by oral literacy. The literacy practice as the research data was mostly through the social media because it was more effective and enjoyable in establishing social relationships. Literacy activities especially writing were generally carried out only to fulfill the tasks of the lecture. Only a very few were doing the literacy activities for personal interest or talent although a variety media had been provided to allow them to participate in creative writing. It could be noted that the cultural literacy was still not a need for student life. The campus role was really required in promoting students’ cultural literacy. The application of appropriate learning models such as Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach could facilitate their cultural literacy. Because this approach provides a variety of learning models to accommodate, harmonize and create the academic habituation of cultural literacy simultaneously.in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherMuhammadiyah University Pressin_ID
dc.subjectculturalin_ID
dc.subjectliteracyin_ID
dc.subjectstudentsin_ID
dc.subjectEnglish departmentin_ID
dc.titleDescriptive Study of Cultural Literacy in English Department of University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utarain_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record