Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiswanta, Siswanta
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-31T02:01:00Z
dc.date.available2017-07-31T02:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-04
dc.identifier.citationBrent H. Baker, (2015). How to Identify Liberal Media Bias, in https://www.studentnewsdaily com/types-of-media-bias/. 11-11-2015; 13.30 PM. Coleman,R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Journalism and Globalization, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen, T. Hanitzsch (Ed.). The handbook of journalism studies New York: Rutledge. Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis Framing : Konstruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media. Yogyakarta : LkiS Entman, R.M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, Sources, and Effects of News Framing. Dalam K. Wahl-Jorgensen, T. Hanitzsch (Ed.). The handbook of journalism studies (h, 175190). New York : Routledge. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear Klapper, J. (1960), The Effects of Mass Communication, New York: Free Press. Hall, Stuart. 1979. Representation: Culture Representation and Signif ying Practices. London: Sage Publication Kustadi, Suhandang. 2004. Pengantar Journalism: Seputar Organisasi, Produk, & Kode Etik, Bandung, Nuansa Cendekia. Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (19900, Learning from political news: Effect of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed), Mass communication and political information processing, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. McLeod, J. M. & Pan. Z (1989). Getting level across and crossing levels. American Behavioral Scientist. McQuail, D. (1994), Mass Communication theory: An introduction (3rd ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Morissan; Wardani, A.C; Hamid, Farid. (2013). Teori Komunikasi Massa, Bogor, Ghalia. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973), Return to the concept of powerful mass media, Studies of Broadcasting, 9.power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology. Tamburaka, A. (2012). Agenda Setting Media Massa. Jakarta : RajaGrafindo Persada. Thapthiang, N. (2012). Analysis of news reporting on south Thailand insurgency: What has been “in” and what has been “out”? And what should be next? Research Report. Pattani: Faculty of Communication Sciences, Prince of Songkla Universityin_ID
dc.identifier.issn2549-5607
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9075
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to understand the news framing Setya Novanto (SN) in the case of “Papa Minta Saham” in the online media Suarakarya.id and Merdeka.com. By using the model of Pan and Kosicki framing analysis, some aspects highlighted by both editors was analyzed according to four structural analyses of syntax, script, thematic and rhetoric that have a better understanding about bias of reporting of both online media. Results of research conducted during November to December 2015 showed that Merdeka.com and Suarakarya.id built reality constructed that SN as ethics and authority incumbency offender, SN as a broker of high profile, as Chairman of the House of Representatives had embarrassed the nation of Indonesia, and SN do not deserve as role models by other officials. Because of news, framing process conducted both online media bias raises the mass media, especially bias by selection of sources and bias by placement. Merdeka. com less wise in implementing the principle of presumption of innocence against SN, on the other hand Suarakarya.id dismissed reports facts that lead to evidence of involvement of SN the legislative and ethics incumbency offender.in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherProgram Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP UMSin_ID
dc.subjectFramingin_ID
dc.subjectonline mediain_ID
dc.subjectconstructionin_ID
dc.subjectrealityin_ID
dc.subjectbiasin_ID
dc.titleAnalysis Of Pan and Kosicki News Model In Case “Papa Minta Saham” In Online Media merdeka.com and suarakarya.idin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record