Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDjumadi, D.
dc.contributor.authorCorebima, A. Duran
dc.contributor.authorSuwono, Hadi
dc.contributor.authorSyamsuri, Istamar
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-03T06:51:54Z
dc.date.available2017-11-03T06:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.citationAnonim. 2017 a . Mind Mapping. Jamescook University Australia. Diakses dariwww.jcu.edu.au/students/learningcentre. Anonim. 2017 b . Teaching and Learning with Mind Map. Tersedia http://www.inspiration.com/visuallearning/mind-mapping. Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach, Ninth Edition. America,New York. McGraw_Hill Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. InL. Wilkerson & W. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problembased learning to higher education:Theory and practice. New Directions For Teaching and Learning Series, No. 68 (pp. 3-11).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Beasley dan Ford. J. 2014. Engaging Students With Problem Based Learning. Diakses dari http://www.pet.hw.ac.uk/research/cblpet /pdfs/eng_stud_prob.pdf. Buzan, T. & Buzan, B. (2000). The mind map book. London: BBC Worldwide Ltd. Chi, M. (2009). Active-ConstructiveInteractive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 73-105. Chin SF, Norhayati M (2012).TeacherCentered Mind Mapping vs StudentCentered Mind Mapping in the Teaching of Accounting at Pre-U Level–An Action Research[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Dolmans, D., & Schmidt, H. (2010). The problem-based learning process. In H. van Berkel, A. Scherpbier, H. Hillen, & C. van der Vleuten (Eds.), Lessons from Problem-based Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., van der Vleuten, C. & Wijnen, W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problembased learning: hold on to the philosophy. Medical education, 35, 884889. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S. Groh, & D. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., & Allen, D.E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S.Groh, & D. Allen (Eds.). The Power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Ekeocha, J. & Brennan, S. E.(2008). Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups. Memory, 16, 245-261. Fonteijn, H and Jimmy Frerejean, J. (2010 ). Enhancing small group functioning in problem based learning using a visual organiser. In Proceeding International Conference. On Enhancing Learning Experience in higher Education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University. Diakses dari http://www.cetl.hku.hk.conference2010/ conf_proc.htm. Hilbert, T. & Renkl, A. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning fromHmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235266. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? .Educational Psychology Review (2004) 16: 235 Keles, O. (2012). Elementary Teachers Views on Mind Mapping. International Journal of Education. ISSN 19485476.2012, Vol. 4, No.1 Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., & DeChurch, L.A. (2009). Information Sharing and TeamPerformance: A Meta-Analysis. Diakses dari Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876-910. Nijstad, B., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213. Paivio, A (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford Rentsch. Joan R, Mello, Abby L & Delise, Lisa A. (2010). Collaboration and meaning analysis process in intense problem solving teams. Journal. Vol 11 Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problembased Learning: De finitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1) Savery, John R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Volume 1, Issue 1. Schmidt, H. (2010). A review of the evidence: Effects of problem-based learning on students and graduates of Maastricht Medical school. In H. van Berkel, A. Scherpbier, H.Hillen, & C. van der Vleuten (Eds.), Lessons from Problembased Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schmidt, H., Molen, H. van der, Winkel, W. te, & Wijnen, W. (2009). Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational psychologist, 44, 227-249. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 302-311.texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? Instruction Science, 36, 53– 73University Press. Van Gelder, T. (2003). Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported ArgumentVisualisation. In P. Kirschner, S. Buckingham Shum, and C. Carr. (Eds.), VisualizingArgumentation. London: Springer. Visschers-Pleijers, A., Dolmans, D., de Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I., Jacobs, J. & van der Vleuten, C. (2006). Student perceptions about the characteristics of an effective discussion during the reporting phase in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40, 924–931. Wittenbaum, G., Holingshead, A., & Botero, I. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286310. Diakses dari www.pet.hw.ac.uk/research/cblpet/pdfs/ eng_stud_prob.pd. Yoga, D. (2007).Applied real-time mindmap @ classroom petunjuk praktis untuk menerapkan kegiatan belajar mengajar berbasismind mapDipresentasikan diKalangan Pendidikan 9 Negara di ASIA,2007.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2527-533X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9381
dc.description.abstractPembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBL) dan mind map memiliki tujuan yang paralel, keduanya didasarkan pada psiswangan pembelajaran konstruktivis.PBL dan mind map perlu diterapkan bersamaan sebagai model pembelajaran utama. PBL terdiri dari masalah yang dirancang dengan cermat yang menantang siswa untuk menggunakan pemikiran kritis,strategi pembelajaran mandiri,keterampilan partisipasi tim, teknik penelitian, dan pengetahuan disipliner.Mind map dapat digunakan sebagai alat pembelajaran untuk membantu pemikiran kritis dalam pembelajaran dengan mendorong siswa untuk mengintegrasikan informasi yang telah ditunjukkan untuk memfasilitasi memori. Keuntungan dari menggunakan mind map dalam pembelajaran adalah bahwa strategi ini dapat mengambil manfaat lebih banyak siswa dengan gaya belajar yang beragam.Tantangan terbesar dengan PBL adalah bagaimanaupaya guru dapat memfasilitasi dari banyak kelompok kelas pada saat yang sama. Dalam PBL, guru memandu proses kelompok dengan mengamati, mengajukan pertanyaan, dan intervensi saat yang tepat. Integrasi mind map dalam sintak PBL akan melengkapi kekurangan pada sintaknya (Beasley dan Ford, 2014). Dengan integrasi mind map ke dalam sintak PBLagar supaya dalam aktivitas pemecahan masalah secara berkelompok dapat terarah dan efisien mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang diharapkan sejak awal dengan bimbingan guru, mengingat pembelajaran dengan model PBL memerlukan waktu yang lama. Mind map merupakan visual outline sehingga memudahkan guru untuk memberikan masukan atau arahan dengan cepat dari hasil pemecahan masalah masing-masing kelompok.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherProsiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek) Ke-2in_ID
dc.subjectmind mapin_ID
dc.subjectpembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBL)in_ID
dc.subjectpembelajaran aktifin_ID
dc.titleMind Map dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah: Tantangan bagi Guru pada Abad 21in_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record