| dc.identifier.citation | Ambarwati, I. 2015. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Disertai Peta Konsep Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana UM. Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. 2007. The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol.8 (3): 293-307. Chittleborough,G. & Treagust, D. F. 2007. The modelling abilityof non-major chemistrystudents and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol.8 (3), 274-292. Cin, M. 2013. Undergraduate Students’ Mental Models of Hailstone Formation. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8 (1): 163-174. Coletta, V.P. (vcolleta@lmu.edu). 27 Agustus 2013. Scientific Reasoning. E-mail kepada Valency Femintasari (valency_87@yahoo.com). Coll, R. K. 2008. Chemistry Learners’ Preferred Mental Models for Chemical Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Vol. 5 (1): 22-47. Coll, R. K. & Treagust, D.F. 2003. Investigation of Secondary School, Undergraduate, and Graduate Leaners’ Mental Models of Ionic Bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 40 (5): 464-486. Ertepinar, H. 1995. The relationship between formal reasoning ability, computer assisted instruction, and chemistry achievement. Journal Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi. Vol. 11 : 21-24. Femintasari, V. 2015. Keefektifan Tes Pilihan Ganda Dua Tingkat dan Tes Pilihan Ganda Disertai Wawancara Untuk Identifikasi Kesalahan Konsep Siswa Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Berbeda Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Lawang. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana UM. Garnett, P.J., & Treagust, D. F. 1990. Implication of Research on Students’ Understanding of Electrochemistry for Improving Science Curricula and Classroom Practice. International Journal of Science Education, 12 (2)147-156. Hanson, R., Donkor, K. T. &Antwi, V. 2011. Investigating Senior High School Students’ Conceptions of Introductory Chemistry Concepts. International Journal of Educational Administration, 3(1): 41 – 57. Hinton, M. E. & Nakhleh, M. B. 1999. Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions. Chem. Educator, 4, 158–167. Jinghan. 2013. Scientific Reasoning: Research, Development, And Assessment. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Athens: Graduate School of The Ohio State University. Johari, J.M.C., & Rachmawati, M. 2007. Kimia 1 SMA dan MA untuk Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga. Kuhn, D. 2010. What is Scientific Thinking and How Does it Develop? New York: Columbia University. Kurnaz, M. A. & Eksi, C. 2015. An Analysis of High School Students’ Mental Models of Solid Friction in Physics. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,vol. 15 (3): 787-795. Kurnaz, M. A. & Emen, A. Y. 2013. Mental Models of the High School Students Related To the Contraction of Matte. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, Vol.4 (1): 15. Lawson, A.E. 2000. Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning, (Online), (http://lsweb.la.asu.edu/alawson/Lawson Assesments.htm, diakses 29 Agustus 2015). Lawson, A. E. 2010. Teaching Inquiry Science in Midlle and Scondary School. Lawson, A.E. (anton.lawson@asu.edu). 30 September 2014. Article Request. E-mail kepada Andri Wahyu Wijayadi (diaandri@gmail.com). McBroom, R.A. 2011. Pre-Service Science Teachers‘ Mental Models Regarding Dissolution and Precipitation Reactions. A Dissertation Submitted to The Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in PartialFfulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Raleigh: North Carolina. Nnorom, N. R. 2013. The Effect of Reasoning Skills on Students Achievement in Biology in Anambra State. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. 4: 12. Oloyede, O. I. 2012. The Relationship between Acquisition of Science Process Skills, Formal Reasoning Ability and Chemistry Achievement. IJAAAS, 8(1), 1-4. Pavelic, M. J. & Abraham, M. R. 1977. Guided Inquiry Laboratoreis for General Chemistry Student. Journal of College Science, 7 (1): 23-26. Sirhan, G. 2007. Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4 (2): 2 – 20. Sunyono, Yuanita, L., Ibrahim M. 2013. Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International Vol. 26, Issue 2, 104-125. Stains, M. & Sevian, H. 2014. Uncovering Implicit Assumptions: a Large-Scale Study on Students’ Mental Models of Diffusion. Res Sec Educ. DOI 10.1007/s11165-014-9450-x. Supriadi. 2016. Analisis Model Mental Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Dalam Memahami Berbagai Jenis Reaksi Kimia Ditinjau Dari Pengetahuan Awal Yang Berbeda. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana UM. Tasker, R. & Dalton, R. 2006. Research In to Practice: Visualisation ofthe Molecular World Using Animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7 (2): 141-159. Wang, C.Y., 2007. The Role of MentalModeling Ability, Content Knowlwdge, and Mental Models in General Chemistry Students’ Understanding about Molecular Polari. Dissertation for the Doctor Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the University of Missouri. Columbia Wu, H.K., Krajcik, J.S., Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol. 38 No.7, hlm.821-84 Wijayadi, A. W. 2015. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Vs Verifikasi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana UM. Vosniadou, S. & BreweR, W. F. 1992. Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cognitive Psychology 24: 535-585 | in_ID |
