| dc.identifier.citation | Asmawan, M.C. (2016). Analisis kesulitan mahasiswa menyelesaikan skripsi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 26 (2), 51-57. Bukit, D.A.B. (2006). Faktor-faktor Penghambat Komunikasi Mahasiswa dengan Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi (Kasus Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Peternakan Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB)). Undergraduate thesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. Ernawati, T. (2013). Sistem SMS Reminder guna Membantu Mempercepat Penyelesaian Waktu Studi Mahasiswa di Jurusan Sistem Informasi Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang. Undergraduate thesis. Semarang: Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Firmansyah, R. (2014). Kecemasan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Tugas Akhir dan Solusinya Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling Islami. Undergraduate thesis. Semarang: IAIN Walisongo Semarang. Hartato, U., Susanti, E., & Maryana. (2016). Analisis faktor pendorong dan penghambat penyelesaian tugas akhir skripsi mahasiswa prodi pendidikan akuntansi FE UNY angkatan 2011. PELITA, XI (2), 107-119. Jones, N.B. & Kochtanek, T.R. (2004). Success factors in the implementation of a collaborative technology and resulting productivity improvement in a small business: an exploratory study. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16 (1), 1-20. Julita. (2015). Faktor-faktor Penghambat Penyelesaian Skripsi Mahasiswa di Jurusan Kesejahteraan Keluarga. Undergraduate thesis. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang. Kangai, C & Mapolista, T. (2012). Factors that affect student’s progress and the completion rate in the research project. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(1), 83-94. Kingofong, S.M. (2004). Penghambat pada Pengerjaan Skripsi. Undergraduate thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Surabaya. Kustiah, S. (2016). Survai Faktor-faktor Penghambat Penulisan Skripsi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Makassar. Research report. Makassar: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Makassar. Rakhmat, J. (1998). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Sarwono. (1997). Metode Riset untuk Desain Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta. Siang, J.J. (2009). Cara Cepat Menyusun Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo. Siswanto, I. & Sampurno, Y.G. (2015). Faktor-faktor penghambat pengerjaan tugas akhir skripsi mahasiswa pendidikan otomotif FT UNY. Jurnal Taman Vokasi, 3 (32), 629-641. | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous studies reported findings that indicate drawbacks linked to the long-term completion of the final assignment at various universities in Indonesia. One of the major findings of these studies revealed that the communication problem between students and supervisors is the main obstacle in the completion of their final assignment. Based on the assessment and observation at the level of Bachelor’s degree (S1) and magister program (S2), it can be assumed that a high number of lecturers/supervisors incline to allocate less special time for guiding their students. They commonly give various reasons and indecisive time for guidance. The reason such as the lecturers’ reluctance to supervise students in relation to their less interest of student’s final paper topics, dislike of
the student’s personality, absence of consultation schedule without obvious reason, and being emotional in supervising the students’ writing. In the contemporary era, communication is dominated by the individual use of social media. Each individual must always be connected with Smartphone, including lecturers and students. In addition, it also affects the communication pattern of lecturers and students. This research is a literature study using qualitative approach. It was done by examining and analyzing the prevailing problems based on the existing literature. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that code of ethics is needed as solution to overcome the problems of communication between student and supervisor. It formulates code of ethics named the “ETIC" code as a system or norm established as a set of basic principles of communication between students and supervisors to promote effective and efficient final assignment guidance in the contemporary era. "ETIC" is the acronym of the four basic principles of Ethics (E), Timeliness (T), Innovation (I), and Transparency (C). In addition, the “ETIC” code is expected to support the acceleration program of final assignment completion. Nevertheless, both
systematic administrative procedures and the ease of access to documents of administrative requirements for final assignment are required to support the implementation of this code. In addition, the monitoring and evaluation process of this code and the acceleration program of final assignment completion are performed by the Final Assignment Ethics Review Committee (FAERC). | id_ID |
