dc.contributor.author | Mardianto, Anang | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-25T04:02:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-04-25T04:02:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abdurrachman, Oemi. 1995. Pemimpin yang Efektif. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Anderson, Kenneth E. 1999. Bagaimana Memimpin dan Mengawasi Pegawai Anda. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Bettinghuse, J Edwin. 1993. Delegasi dalam Manajemen Perusahaan, Rahasia Kekuatan Manajer Sukses. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia. Handoko, Hani. 1993. Penilaian Kinerja. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Handoko, Hani. 2000. Meningkatkan Produktivitas Karyawan. Bandung: PT Kineka Cipta. Heidjerahman dan Su’ad Husnan. 1996. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM. Ibrahim, Adam. 1995. Bunga Rampai Manajemen Operasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Dian. Kartono, Kartini. 1996. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: UI Press. Manulang. 2000. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Mashud, Muh. 1997. Komunikasi Pemahaman dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia. Moekijat. 1987. Manajemen Personalia. Bandung: Alumni. Muhammad, Arni. 2000. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Soekadi, DS. 1990. 10 Hukum Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Taramedia dan Restu Agung. Soenarko. 1996. Kinerja Karyawan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Thoha, Mifah. 1983. Pembinaan Organisasi Proses Diagnosa dan Intervensi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Uchana, Onong. 1998. Public Relation dalam Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Gremedia Presindo. Wahjosumidjo. 1980. Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen Suatu Pendekatan Perilaku. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1411-3422 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/996 | |
dc.description.abstract | The thesis was purposed to know the effects of communication and
motivation fac on performance in PT BPD Central Java of Surakarta branch
and what is the dominant faktor affecting employee’s performance. The result
of the analysis showed that performance was affected by 29 constant value
unit plus 0,366 variable value unit of communication plus 0,154 value unit
motivation. The natural logarithm result, the performance was affected by
1,677 variable constant value unit plus 0,417 variable value unit of Ln
communication plus 0,173 value unit motivations. In discussion, t-estimation
value for communication was significant at 5% and t-estimation value
motivation for motivation was significant at 5%, each variable had value of
0,366 and 0m154 for model without natural logarithm and 0,417 and 0,173
for the model with natural logarithm. So, it can be concluded that both
communication and motivation were affecting significant on performance
or working achievement of PT Bank BPD Jateng Branch of Surakarta. | en_US |
dc.subject | performance | en_US |
dc.subject | working motivation | en_US |
dc.subject | communication | en_US |
dc.title | ANALISIS PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI ATASAN BAWAHAN DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA DI PT BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH JAWA TENGAH CABANG SURAKARTA | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |