Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMardianto, Anang
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-25T04:02:27Z
dc.date.available2012-04-25T04:02:27Z
dc.date.issued2004-06
dc.identifier.citationAbdurrachman, Oemi. 1995. Pemimpin yang Efektif. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Anderson, Kenneth E. 1999. Bagaimana Memimpin dan Mengawasi Pegawai Anda. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Bettinghuse, J Edwin. 1993. Delegasi dalam Manajemen Perusahaan, Rahasia Kekuatan Manajer Sukses. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia. Handoko, Hani. 1993. Penilaian Kinerja. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Handoko, Hani. 2000. Meningkatkan Produktivitas Karyawan. Bandung: PT Kineka Cipta. Heidjerahman dan Su’ad Husnan. 1996. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM. Ibrahim, Adam. 1995. Bunga Rampai Manajemen Operasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Dian. Kartono, Kartini. 1996. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: UI Press. Manulang. 2000. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Mashud, Muh. 1997. Komunikasi Pemahaman dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia. Moekijat. 1987. Manajemen Personalia. Bandung: Alumni. Muhammad, Arni. 2000. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Soekadi, DS. 1990. 10 Hukum Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Taramedia dan Restu Agung. Soenarko. 1996. Kinerja Karyawan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Thoha, Mifah. 1983. Pembinaan Organisasi Proses Diagnosa dan Intervensi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Uchana, Onong. 1998. Public Relation dalam Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Gremedia Presindo. Wahjosumidjo. 1980. Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen Suatu Pendekatan Perilaku. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1411-3422
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/996
dc.description.abstractThe thesis was purposed to know the effects of communication and motivation fac on performance in PT BPD Central Java of Surakarta branch and what is the dominant faktor affecting employee’s performance. The result of the analysis showed that performance was affected by 29 constant value unit plus 0,366 variable value unit of communication plus 0,154 value unit motivation. The natural logarithm result, the performance was affected by 1,677 variable constant value unit plus 0,417 variable value unit of Ln communication plus 0,173 value unit motivations. In discussion, t-estimation value for communication was significant at 5% and t-estimation value motivation for motivation was significant at 5%, each variable had value of 0,366 and 0m154 for model without natural logarithm and 0,417 and 0,173 for the model with natural logarithm. So, it can be concluded that both communication and motivation were affecting significant on performance or working achievement of PT Bank BPD Jateng Branch of Surakarta.en_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectworking motivationen_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.titleANALISIS PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI ATASAN BAWAHAN DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA DI PT BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH JAWA TENGAH CABANG SURAKARTAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record