| dc.identifier.citation | Abbott, P., 2012. Stabilisation policies in developing countries after the 2007-08 food crisis. Agricultural Policies for Poverty Reduction, pp.109-168. Bunga & cieny, supply-chain.tp.ugm.ac.id/artikel/2017/27-manajemen-rantai-pasokcabai- yang-berkelanjutan.html. Eko Prasetyo, B., 2010. Analisis Keterpaduan Pasar Cabai Rawit Antara Pasar Legi dengan Pasar Gede dan Pasar Nusukan di Kota Surakarta (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Sebelas Maret). Galtier, F., 2009. agritrop.cirad.fr, How to manage food price instability in developing countries?. Galtier, F., 2013. Managing food price instability: Critical assessment of the dominant doctrine. Global Food Security, 2(2), pp.72-81. Galtier, F., 2011. Which instruments best tackle food price instability in developing countries?. Development in practice, 21(4-5), pp.526-535. Gouel, C., 2013. Food price volatility and domestic stabilization policies in developing countries (No. w18934). National bureau of economic research. Indonesia, Statistics. "The Corpus of Chili Statistics." 2016. Jamillah, J., 2014. Peluang Dan Kendala Kemitraan Agribisnis Hortikultura Di Aceh. Economic Management & Business, 15(3). Odozi, J.C. and Omonona, B.T., 2012. Governance options for price instability: A review of the food grain commodity in Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 4(4), pp.93-100. Purba, T.Y., Tarigan, K. and Salmiah, S., 2017 DAMPAK NILAI TUKAR PETANI TERHADAP KESEJAHTERAAN PETANI CABAI MERAH (Capsicum annum L.)(Kasus: Desa Hinalang, Kecamatan Purba, Kabupaten Simalungun). JOURNAL ON SOCIAL ECONOMIC OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRIBUSINESS, 8(6). Torero, M. and Von Braun, J., 2010. Alternative mechanisms to reduce food price volatility and price spikes. International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council. | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to identify the formation of chili commodity prices and
analyze the availability of supplies and other factors that may exist that affect
fluctuations in the price of chili. The sample of this research consists of 7 regencies
and cities, Surakarta, Sragen, Sukoharjo, Wonogiri, Karanganyar, Klaten, and
Boyolali. Respondents are 126 people, consisting of farmers, collectors, wholesalers,
small traders and end consumers. Analysis using Producer Production, Margin, and
Margin Profit Ratio (RPM) Price correlation analysis. Analysis of price
transmission elasticity, Market Degrees Concentration Analysis. Results
Determination of pepper commodity prices is determined by wholesalers. Based on
the analysis of the share of producers shows that the average market share is very
good in terms of chili farmers. The highest profit margin ratio is at the Trainer level
of 1.58, then the farmer's level is 1.23, while at the wholesale and small traders level,
the profit ratio is only 0.07 for small traders and 0.03 for wholesalers. Meanwhile,
policy measures related to price stabilization are: Stabilization of existing
production management so that planning and realization are more accurate;
Partnership with industry, to provide price guarantees (anticipate declining prices).
Promotion of processed chili consumption (sauce, ground pepper); Open import, in
case of supply shortage. | id_ID |
