dc.contributor.author | Fajarwati, Ariskha Lianasari | |
dc.contributor.author | Sudiyanto, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartono, H | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-12T03:02:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-12T03:02:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmadi, dkk. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Sekolah Terpadu. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publiaher. Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Bungin, B. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana. Depdiknas .2006. Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Hasibuan, dan Moedjiono. 2006. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Remaja Rosdakarya. Jeanette Colby. 2000. “Defining Quality in Education”. The Education Section, Programme Division, UNICEF New York. Kamijan dan Suyono. 2002. Pelatihan Terintegrasi Berbasis Kompetensi Pelajaran Menyimak. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Kurniasih, Imas, dan Berlin Sani. 2014. Implementasi Kuirkulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Suarabaya: Kata Pena. Rachmawati, Tutik., & Daryanto. 2015. Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran yang Mendidik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. Solchan dkk. 2008. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. St.Y. Slamet. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia. Surakarta: UNS Press. Sudjana, Nana. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo. Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suhartono. (2005). Pengembangan Bicara Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Sukmadinata, N.S. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda. Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa. Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Menulis sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa. Zulela. 2012. Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Apresiasi Sastra di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. | id_ID |
dc.identifier.issn | 2503-5185 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/10048 | |
dc.description.abstract | Writing is a skill that must be possessed by students ranging from primary level to university level. Write
beginning with the cursive writing to be one of the competency standard curriculum demands. With the
application of a different curriculum between curriculum 2006 and curriculum 2013 makes a difference
also in the learning process and the results of students’ skills in cursive writing. The objevtive of this
research is to compare the cursive writing learning in the curriculum 2006 and curriculum 2013 that found
a pattern of curriculum or learning methods appropriate to be applied in a low grade in elementary school.
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach through a comparative study at twelve primary schools
in the town of Sragen. The subjects of the 2nd grade students. The sampling technique was conducted by
purposive sampling. Data collection through questionnaires, interviews, observation, and documentation.
The data analysis used the model of interactive analysis consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and
drawing the conclusion. The results showed that the cursive writing learning skills more deeply on primary
school curriculum of 2006 than primary school curriculum of 2013. The exact method of learning cursive
writing is the method according to the students’ needs and learning materials, meaningful, motivating and
improve the skills of teachers in training cursive writing writing skills in students. | id_ID |
dc.language.iso | en_US | id_ID |
dc.publisher | The 2nd International Conference On Child-Friendly Education (ICCE) 2018 | id_ID |
dc.title | Learning the Cursive Writing in Curriculum 2006 and 2013 in the Primary School of Sragen | id_ID |
dc.type | Article | id_ID |