| dc.identifier.citation | Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Jabar, epi Safruddin Abdul. 2010. Evaluasi program pendidikan. Pedoman Teoriris Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Edisi Kedua, Cetakan ke empat. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016. Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Bagian Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Sekretariat Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. DuPree, Chase Tahira. 2011. The Children Left Behind: An Evaluation of a Reading Intervention Program for Upper Elementary Student. Education Doctoral. St. John Fisher College. Heather, Thomas. 2013. An Evaluation of The Literacy Program at GaribaldiGrade School. Doctor of Education. George Fox University. Peraturan Menteri No. 23 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti. Mulyaningsih, Endang. 2011. Riset Terapan Bidang Pendidikan dan Teknik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta. Wirawan. 2011. Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The aims of this research are to describe about implementation and constrains of School Literacy Program
at SDN Ambarukmo. The research is evaluation research which use CIPP evaluation model. The evaluation
limited to context, input, process, and product aspects. The subjects of this research are 10 students of
each grade I, II, III, IV, and V, 1 headmaster, and 2 teachers at SDN Ambarukmo which was collected by
purposive sampling. Data collected by observation, documentasion, and interview. Data analysis technique
used is qualitative descriptive. The result show that SDN Ambarukmo need school literacy program. In
input aspect, this program need support by infrastructure, human resources, budget, and various procedure.
Process aspect, storybooks should be renewal and teacher must be conduct the students. Product aspect
show that 95% students SDN Ambarukmo was read fluently 15 minutes before the lesson; 45% are able
to storytelling; 40% able to make speech independently. But, the making poems, writing diaries, making
summaries activities have not done well. Based on findings, literacy program should be continued but need
improvement. | id_ID |
