Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHikmat, Mauly Halwat
dc.contributor.authorThoyibi, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorPrasetyarini, Aryati
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-23T08:51:24Z
dc.date.available2019-01-23T08:51:24Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBlum, R. W. 2005. A case for school connectedness. Educational Lead-ership 62 (7): 16–20. Bowers, R. 2015. A pedagogy of success: Meeting the challenges of urban middle schools. The Clearing House 73 (4): 235–38. Boneshefski, M. J., & Runge, T. J. (2014). Addressing disproportionate discipline practices within a School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports framework: A practical guide for calculating and using disproportionality rates. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 149-158. Gutierrez, E. (2012,April 26). Natural and logical consequences: How implementing them leads to better discipline in children. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension. James K. Luiselli , Robert F. Putnam , Marcie W. Handler & Adam B. Feinberg(2005) Whole-school positive behaviour support: effects on student discipline problems and academic performance, Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental, 25:2-3, 183-198, DOI: 10.1080/0144341042015301265 Nelsen, Jane (2011). Positive discipline: The classic guide to helping children develop self-discipline, responsibility, cooperation, and problem solving skills. California: Random House Publishing Group.id_ID
dc.identifier.issn2503-5185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/10587
dc.description.abstractThis article aims at exploring the teachers perspectives on the approach to building discipline in students at schools in Surakarta, how they understand the concept of positive discipline, how disciplines are built at their school viewed from child right perspective, and types of punishment imposed by the schools. The participants were 22 teachers and 5 students from 15 schools in Surakarta. The data were collected through questionnaires and interview and were analyzed inductively. The findings show that all teachers perceive that to build discipline in students, teachers and school should have a clear school rules with some punishment. For the students who break the rules, there should be punishment which should 1) shape their good character, 2) make students responsible, 3) not be in the form of physical punishment, 4) be proportional, 5) be aimed to give them sanction/consequences of their fault, 6) make students learn from the mistakes, and 7) give deferrant effect. According to them, the positive discipline: 1) shapes good character of students, 2, gives reward and punishment, 3) gives positive effect, and 4) gives punitive effect. To build disciplines, their schools impose school rules for students including the sanctions for those disobeying the rules. For teachers and schools, the discipline building is for the sake of students to be better, however, the emphasis is on the importance of its punitive effect not on the communication to build awareness about the consequences of their misbehavior.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherThe 2nd International Conference On Child-Friendly Education (ICCE) 2018id_ID
dc.subjectpositive disciplineid_ID
dc.subjectchild rightsid_ID
dc.titleBuilding Discipline in Students of High Schools in Surakarta Regency, Indonesia: A Child-Right Perspectiveid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record