| dc.identifier.citation | Brown, Penelope. and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Diani, Giuliana. 2017. “Criticism and Politeness Strategies in Academic Review Discourse: A Contrastive (English-Italian) Corpus-Based Analysis.” Journal of ISSN 1392–1517. Accessed on 15:32, 29th, October, 2019. (https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2017.11188.) Grundy, Peter. 2000. Doing pragmatics (2nd ed.). London: Arnold. Handayani, K.Wahyu. 2017. “The Politeness Strategies of Criticizing Utterances by The Students of English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Surakarta.” Bachelor degree paper, Department of English Education. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Hinkel, Eli. 1997. “Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data”. Applied Linguistics, 18, 1-26. Accessed on 21:31, 21st, January, 2019. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1) Nuryani, Efa., Titik Sudartinah. and Nandy I. Kurnia. 2016. "A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness Features of Criticism in Joseph Mcginty’s This Means War". Sastra Inggris – Quill. Vol 5, No 2 (2016). Retrieved November 6, 2018 (http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/quill/article/view/1090/2049) Oxford Mini Dictionary & Thesaurus. 2008. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. Seran, Dogancay, Aktuna, & Kamisli Sibel. 1997. “Pragmatic transfer in interlanguage development: A case study of advanced EFL learners.” Dogancy-Aktuna. Accessed on 21:35, 21st, January, 2019. (https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED408818) Tsui, Amy B. M. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wijayanto, A., Malikatul Laila., Aryati Prasetyarini and Susiati Susiati. 2013. “Politeness in Interlanguage Pragmatics of Complaints by Indonesian Learners of English.” English Language Teaching. Vol. 6, No. 10; 2013. (http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p18) | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | This research is aimed to (1) classify the strategies of politeness used by the overseas students of UMS in criticizing and (2) describe how power and distance influence the overseas students of UMS in using politeness in criticism strategies. There are 25 data which were collected through DCT. The data validity is taken through expert judgement. The results of this research shows that (1) the highest percentage belongs to positive politeness strategy with 87 times used (39%), followed by bald on record by 60 times used (27%) and 24% belongs to negative politeness with 55 times used. Off record becomes the least percentage. (2) there are patterns of how distance and power influence the overseas students' decision in choosing politeness strategies. The speakers who are close-higher, close-lower, familiar-lower, and unfamiliar lower toward the hearers tend to use positive politeness. Those who are close-equal, familiar-equal, and unfamiliar-higher to hearers tend to use negative politeness. Finally, those who are familiar-higher and unfamiliar-equal toward the hearers tend to use bald on record strategy. | id_ID |
