Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAriffin, Zainal
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T03:19:04Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T03:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, Mark and Kathy. 2003. Tex Type in English.Australia: PTY Ltd. Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (2000) Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer. Depdiknas. 2006. Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Daryanto. 1990. Media Visual. Bandung : Tarsito. Depdiknas. 2003. Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan CAR (Classroom Action Research). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama. Hammond, Jenny et al. 1992. English for Social Purposes. A Handbook for Teachers of Adult Literacy. Sydney: Marcquire University. Sadiman, Arief, dkk. 1996. Media Pendidikan. Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Sudibyo AP, Drs, MPd. 2006. Laporan Penelitian , Pemerintah Kota Semarang. William R. Lee. 1983. A Study Dictionary of Social English. New York: Pergamon Press. Nurhadi,dkk. 2006. Kontekstual dan penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang. O’Malley, J. Michael. 1995. Authentic Assessment For Language learners. Longman. Willy Renandya. 1992. Research Methodology. RELC. Singapore. Jaremy Harmer. 2003. How to Teach English . Longman. Sadiman, Arif S, Dr. 1984. Media pendidikan. Pustekom Dikbud dan PT Raja Gofindo persada. NSW, KJ. Eltis, Dr. 1991. An Approach to Writing K-12. Australia: NSW department of School Education. Moh. Uzer Usman, Drs. 1993. Upaya Optimalisasi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Penerbit PT Remaja Rosda karya. Poerwodarminto, 1998. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta : Balai Pustaka. Poerwodarminto, 1980. Kamus Lengkap bahasa Inggris , Jakarta : Balai Pustaka. Riyadi santoso, Drs. M.Ed. 2003. Semiotika Sosial Pandangan Terhadap Bahasa. Surabaya: Pustaka eurika. Tri Wiratmo, Drs, MA. 2003. Kiat Menulis Karya Ilmiah dalam Bahasa Inggris.Jogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Suharsimi Arikunto. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.id_ID
dc.identifier.issn2621-1661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/11387
dc.description.abstractThis is a classroom action research. Its title was English Communication Competency Improvement on Spoken and Written Narrative Text Through “VCD Cutting” Media inMTs PPMI Assalaam Sukoharjo. The aim of this action research was to improve students’ English learning result. The learning process was implemented with two cycles (modes), spoken and written English. Each cycle covered four steps, namely “Building Knowledge of the field, “Modeling Text”, “Joint Construction of the Text”and “Independent/ Individual Construction of the Text. The implementation of these steps wasdivided into 3 cycles in action research, cycle I, II and III. Each cycle covered: Planning, Implementation, Observation and Reflection. The research area covered: 1) Genre: Narrative Text for students of Grade VII Language Program, semester 1. 2) The problems proposed: How to improve students’ creativity, activities, and scores to express and response meaning in monolog text in spoken and written accurately and acceptably on narrative text. This research is for students ofMTs PPMI Assalaamgrade VIII. Motivation and scientific attitude was measured with questionnaires. Activities and skill process to communicate in spoken and written were measured with rubric assessment when they presented their group work of narrative reaching the Joint Construction of the Text. It was typed in Power Point completed with animation, sound, color, the depth of the material and “VCD Cutting”. Cognitive domain was measured with pre-test and post-test. The results of the research were as follows: The result of the test in cycle I was 63 <= SKBM (School Passing Grade 64), it didn’t fulfill the action achievement indicator. In cycle II, III fulfilled the action achievement indicator >= SKBM (School Passing Grade 65). The students’ average score were 71 in Cycle II and 79 in cycle III. Students’ motivation and sciencetific result fulfill the achievement indicator. There were 26 out of 30 students gave positive response by stating agree towards the questionnaires so there were only 4 students who didn’t agree with the questionnaires. The average score in cycle II on the spoken group workpresentation was 84 >= 65 and on the written group work presentation was 84 >= 65 and this result really fulfilled the result of an action research. In cycle III the students’ average score on the independent/ Individual Construction of Text was 70 which meant >= the school passing grade 65. It meant that it fulfilled the achievement Indicator.id_ID
dc.language.isoen_USid_ID
dc.publisherSeminar Nasional Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (SEMNAS KBSP) IV 2016id_ID
dc.titleEnglish Communication Competency Improvement On Spoken and Written Narrative Text through “VCD Cutting” Media at MTs PPMI Assalaamid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record