| dc.identifier.citation | Corder, S. P. 1981. Error Anlaysis and Interlanguage. New York: Oxford University Press. Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design (Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches). United State of America: SAGE. Dulay, H. et al. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press. Ehrlich, Eugene. 2004. English Grammar. Jakarta: Erlangga. Fauziati, Endang.2009. Readings on Applied Linguistics. Surakarta: Era Pustaka Utama. . 2010. Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). Surakarta: Era Pustaka Utama. Freeman, D.L and Long, M.H 1991. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London and NewYork. Longman. Hasyim, Sunardi. (2002), Error Analysis in the Teaching of English, Puslit Petra. Vol.4, no 01, pp. 42-50 Moleong, L.J. 1988. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif,. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya. Ratnah, (2013), Error Analysis on Tenses Usage Made by Indonesian Students, Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.4, No.6, pp.159-169 Santosa, Rochmat Budi. (2011), Error Analysis on the Use of “Be” in the Students’ Composition, REGISTER, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 147-162 Akhmadsudrajat, 2015 https://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/pembelajaran -remidialdalam- ktsp (Accessed on Sunday, March 02 2015 at 05.28 p.m) British Course, 2014 http://britishcourse.com/tag/definition-of-recount-text (Accesed on Saturday, October 18 2014 at 10.21 a. m) English Encyclopedia, 2014. http://www.encyclo.co.uk/meaning-of-Generic%20Structure (Acessed on Monday, November 10 2014 at 10.05 a. m) Englishindo, 2014 www.englishindo.com › Recount (Accessed on Monday ,November 10 2014 at 10.10 a. m) English Leson. 2014 http://pakpuguh.wordpress.com (Accessed on Tuesday, November11 2014 at 09.23 a.m) Freeenglishcourse, 2014 freeenglishcourse.info (Accessed on Tuesday, November11 2014 at 09.23 a.m) Libguides. 2014 http://libguides.usc.edu/content.php?pid=83009&sid=615867 (Accesed on Saturday, October 25 2014 at 07.23 p. m) Mediafire. 2014 www.mediafire.com ( Acessed on Monday, November 10 at 11.00 a. m) Nazwa blogger, 2014 http://nazwablogger.blogspot.com (Accessed on Tuesday, November11 2014 at 09.30 a.m) Scielo, 2014. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S1657- 07902008000200008&script=sci_arttext (Accesed on Friday, October 17 2014 at 06.30 p.m) Oxford dictionary, 2014. http:// oxforddictionary.com (Accesed on Monday, November 10 2014 at 10.01 a. m) Wikipedia, 2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_%28linguistics%29 (Accesed on Friday, October 17 2014 at 06.20 p. m) | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | In the process of language learning, error is a case that can not be avoided.
Making some errors are able to do even by the university students. The objective of the
study is to describe the similarities and differences of types of error made by the first and
the third semester students of English Department UMS 2014/ 2015 academic year. This
study is qualitative research. The data are taken from all interlanguage errors which are
made by the student’s writing recount text. The data classifies by using the combination
of linguistic category and surface strategy taxonomy by Dulay, H et al. (1982). The
results of this study were: (1) the similarities types of error that were made by the first
and the third semester students were morphological and syntactical error. In the
morphological error the writer found some similar types of error, namely: ommission of
bound morpheme {-s} as plural marker and wrong spelling of the words. Meanwhile in
the syntactical error, the similarities were found on article (omission of definite article
the), omission of subject, omission of suffix (-ed) in regular past tense, etc. In the other
side, the differences types of error happened in the syntactical error only. There were
some types of error that were made by the first semester students but the third semester
students did not, such as article (omission of indefinite article a/ an), omission of
introductory THERE as subject, the use of verb as past tense (verb II is used after
‘modal’ form), etc. | id_ID |
