dc.identifier.citation | [1] Bandura. A. 1989. Social Cognitive Theory. Greenwich: JAI Press. [2] __________, 1997. “Exercise of Personal and Collective Efficacy in Changing Societies”, in Bandura, A. (Ed.),Self Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, hal 1-45. [3] __________. 1999. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2 : 21-41 [4] Baron, R.A. & Byrne, D. 2004. Psikologi Sosial. Edisi Terjemahan. Jakarta : Salemba Empat [5] Chen, J.-lin, & Wilkosz, M. E. 2014. Efficacy of technology-based interventions for obesity prevention in adolescents : a systematic review. Health Care, 159-171. [6] Dalyono. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. [7] Dona, BG., Lippke, S., Renner, B., Kwon, S., Schwarzer, R. 2009. Self Efficacy and Planning Predict Dietary Behaviors in Costa Rican and South Korean Women :Two Moderated Mediation Analyses. Applied Psychology : Health and Well Being. Vol 1 No. 1, pp : 91-104. [8] Gao, Z., Xiang, P., Lee, AM., dan Harrison L. 2008. Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in beginning weight training class: their relations to students' behavioral intention and actual behavior. Journal of Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Mar 2008; vol. 79, No.1; pp. 92-100. USA: American Alliance For Health, Physical Education, Recreation, And Dance. [9] Ghufron, M. N. dan Risnawati, Rini. 2010. Teori-teori Psikologi (pp. 73-81). Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. [10] Hasibuan, S.P.M. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. [11] Kemenkes RI., Balitbangkes.2013. Riset Kesehatan Dasar Tahun 2013. Jakarta: Balitbangkes Kemenkes RI. [12] Morgan, P. J., Philip morgan newcastle edu.au, E., & Hayley scott newcastle.edu.au, E. 2014. Associations between program outcomes and adherence to social cognitive theory tasks : process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men. Clinical Trials. [13] Nussy, CY., Ratag, GA., Mayulu, N., 2014. Analisis Upaya-Upaya Penurunan Berat Badan Pada Mahasiswi Angkatan 2010 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. Jurnal Kedokteran Komunitas dan Tropik. Vol 2 No. 2. pp : 81- 84 [14] Obong, H., Ibeanu, V., Onuha, N., dan Ejekwu, A. 2012. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and thinness among urban schoolaged children and adolescents in southern Nigeria. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. Vol. 33, No. 4. The United Nation University. [15] Palmeira, A., Teizeira, P., Branco, T. 2007. Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories.International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 4:14, pp 1- 12. [16] Sarintohe, E dan Prawitasari, JE. 2006. Teori Sosial-Kognitif Dalam Menjelaskan Prilaku Makan Sehat Pada Anak Yang Mengalami Obesitas. Sosiosains, Vol 19 (3) pp : 345- 355. [17] Toruan, P. 2007. Fat-Loss Not Weight-Loss: Gemuk tapi ramping. Jakarta: TransMedia. [18] Williams, D.M., 2010. Outcome Expectancy and Self-Efficacy: Theoretical Implications of an Unresolved Contradiction. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 14 (4), pp : 417 –425 | id_ID |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global health problem that has been
increasing in various age groups, including adolescents. Overweight and
obesity should be prevented to reduce the risks of various chronic diseases,
including cardio-vascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. Albert Bandura
proposed Social Cognitive Theory to explain health-related behaviors. This
study aimed to determine the relationship between knowledge, environmental
observation, outcome expectation, self-efficacy, and preventive
behavior of overweight in adolescent, using Social Cognitive Theory.
SUBJECT AND METHODS: This was an analytic observational study
with cross sectional design, conducted in Malang, East Java. A total of 90
overweight or obese high school students in Malang were selected for this
study. A set of questionnaire was designed to measure knowledge, environmental
observation, outcome expectation, self-efficacy, and preventive
behavior of overweight. This questionnaire was tested for validity and
reliability. The data was analyzed using multiple linear regression model
on STATA program.
RESULTS: Environmental observation (b=0.11; CI 95%=0.00 to 0.23;
p=0.047), outcome expectation (b=0.11; CI 95%=0.00 to 0.22; p=0.041),
and self-efficacy (b=0.14; CI 95%=0.04 to 0.24; p=0.006) had positive
relationship with preventive behavior of overweight. However, the
relationship between knowledge and preventive behavior was not statistically
significant (b=-0.14; CI 95%=-0.44 to 0.15; p=0.342). Together the
independent variables in the model explained 38% of the variation in
preventive behavior of overweight (adjusted R2=38.06).
CONCLUSION: Environmental observation, outcome expectation, and
self-efficacy had positive relationship with preventive behavior overweight. | id_ID |