Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuti, Suni
dc.contributor.authorSuharto, Didik G
dc.contributor.authorHaryanti, Rina Herlina
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-23T02:31:29Z
dc.date.available2019-11-23T02:31:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAbidin, Said Zainal, 2004. Kebijakan Publik. Pancar Siwah. Jakarta. Achsani N.A. 2014. Tantangan Baru Ekonomi Politik Indonesia Menghadapi Problema Lokal dan Tantangan Global. Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 24 September 2014. Akib Haedar. 2010. Implementasi Kebijakan Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana. Jurnal Administrasi Publik. Vol.1 No. 1. Anderson, James E. 1984. Public Policy Making. New York. Holt, Rinehart And Wiston. Awotide Bola Amoke, Karimov Aziz A dan Diagne Aliou. 2016. Agricultural Technology Adoption Commercialization and Smallholder Rice Farmer’s Welfare in Rural Nigeria. Agricultural and Food Economics 4:3 DOI 10.1186/S40400-016-0047-8. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian Indonesia Implementasi dan Dampak terhadap Kesejahteraan Petani dan Perspektif Sensus Pertanian 2013. www.bps.go.id Badan Pusat Statistik. 2014. Nilai Tukar Petani Kabupaten Boyolali Tahun 2014. www.bpd. go.id Badan Pusat Statistik. 2014. Nilai Tukar Petani Jawa Tengah. www.bps.go.id. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. Analisis Tematik ST2013 Subsektor Transformasi Struktural Usahatani dan Petani Indonesia. www.bps.go.id. Bappeda dan BPS Boyolali. 2014. www.bps.go.id. Basrowi dan Suwandi. 2010. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Bautista Romeo M. 1 9 9 9 The Price Competitiveness Of Rice Production In Vietnam Effects Of Domestic Policies And External Factors. Asean Economic Bulletin; Apr 1999; 16, 1; Proquest Research Library Pg. 80 Asean Economic Bulletin Vol. 16. No.1. Dunn William. 1984. Analisa Kebijakan Publik. Hanindita Offset.Yogyakarta Dye Thomas R. 1981. Understanding Public Policy. 3th (Englewood Cliffs, Nj; Prentice Hall. Emokaro C. O. And Ayantoyinboa. A. Analysis Of Market Integration And Price Variation In Rice Marketing In Osun State, Nigeria. American Journal Of Experimental Griculture. 4(5): 601- 618, 2014. Hossain Mahbub. 2013. What Implications Does The World Food Price Rise Have For Food Security In Bangladesh. International Journal Of Food And Agricultural Economics. Issn 2147- 8988. Vol. 2 No. 1 Pp. 51-63. Jermsittiparsert Kittisak, Sriyakul Thanaporn & Rodboonsong Sudarat. 2013. Power (Lessness) Of The State In Globalisation Era: Empirical Proposals On Determination Of Domestic Paddy Price In Thailand. Asian Social Science; Vol. 9, No. 17; 2013 Issn 1911-2017 E-Issn 1911-2025 Published By Canadian Center Of Science And Education Johan. 2013. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Harga Pembelian Pemerintah (HPP) terhadap Beras di Sumatera Utara. Journal on Socio economic of Agriculture and Agribussiness Vol.2 No.2 Februari 2013. Karwasra Kundu Dan Jain Kusum. 2003. Impact Of Domestic Price Policy On Production And International Trade Of Rice And Wheat In India. Indian Journal Of Agricultural Economics; Jul-Sep 2003; 58, 3; Proquest Research Library. I/D. Ji/. Oj/Lgri. Lico». V() I. 58. No. 3. July-Sept. 2003 Maulana dan Rachman. 2009. Evaluasi Kebijakan Sistem Distribusi dan Efektivitas Harga Eceran Tertinggi. Jurnal Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian 3 (1), 2009: 57-69. Nakamura, Robert. T and Frank Smallwood, 1980, The Politics of Policy Implementation, New York, St. Martin‘s Press. Otoo Emmanuel Asane. 2012. Asymmetric Price Transmission Between Local A nd Imported Rice Prices In Burkina Faso. Journal Of Economics And Behavioral Studies. Vol.4. No.9. Pp.523-532. September 2012. Rusono Nono, Sunari Anwar, Candradijaya Ade, Martino Ifan, Tejaningsih. 2013. Analisis Nilai Tukar Petani (NTP) Sebagai Bahan Penyusun Rjmn Tahun 2015-2019. Direktorat Pangan Dan Pertanian, Bappenas. Jakarta. Santoso Purwo. 2010. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Research Center For Politics And Goverment. Jurusan Politik Dan Pemerintahan Ugm. Yogyakarta. Sembiring Surya Abadi, Harianto, Siregar Hermanto, dan Sarasih Bungaran. 2012. Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah Melalui Instruksi Presiden Tahun 2005-2008 Tentang Kebijakan Perberasan Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan. Forum Pascasarjana Vol.35 No. 1 Januari 2012. Sharif Chaudhr Imran Y And Abo U Hassan. 2009. The Impact Of Socioeconomic And Demographic Variables On Poverty: A Village Study. The Lahore Journal Of Economics. 14 : 1 (Summer 2009): Pp. 39-68 Slamet Yulius. 2012. Kemiskinan Petani Pedesaan Analisis Mengenai Sebab-Sebab Dan Alternatif Pemecahannya. Seminar Nasional Laboratorium Sosiologi Sosiologi-Fisip Universitas Sebelas Maret. . Http://sosiologi.fisip.uns.ac.id Tachjan. 2006. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Asosiasi Ilmu Politik Indonesia (Aipi)-Pusat Kp2w Lemlit Unpad, Truen Rth. Bandung. Wang Kuan-Min dan Lee Yuan-Ming. 2009. A Measure of Marketing Price Transmission in The Rice Market of Taiwan. Zb, rad, Ekon, Fak, Rij, Vol.27 sv2 311-326. Widadie Fanny Dan Sutanto Adi. 2012. Model Ekonomi Perberasan: Analisis Integrasi Pasar Dan Simulasi Kebijakan Harga. Sepa: Vol 8.No.2 Pebruari 2002. Yulisa Mila. 2008. Efektivitas Penetapan Harga Pembelian Pemerintah (Hpp) Gabah Terhadap Pendapatan Petani (Kasus Kecamatan Binong, Dan Kecamatan Pusakanagara, Kabupaten Subang, Jawa-Barat). Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Pertanian Bogor. Zhou Y Zhang, Wan Guang H, Chen Liang B. . 2000. Integration Of Rice Markets: The Case Of Southern China. Contemporary Economic Policy; Jan 2000; 18, 1; Proquest Research Library. Pg. 95id_ID
dc.identifier.issn2615-1588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/11688
dc.description.abstractResearch on the factors of performance effectiveness of the goverment’s paddy dan rice purchase price policy in Sawit Boyolali is qualitative research that discusses about the policy of measured success based on performance use 3 variables i.e. encouragement and coercion at the federal level, the capacity of the central/ state, and encouragement and coercion at the level of the centre and the regions. The model used to measure the effectiveness of the performance of paddy and rice HPP in Sawit Boyolali is Goggin et al Model. This policy according to researcher has clear goals and objectives. Implementors have the concept that is formulated in the form of the policy drawn up in detail. But the success of these policies need to be well understood by farmers. Researchers assessed the policy for the moment not too relevant to the conditions in the market. Paddy or rice HPP are below the market price. However, the increase in paddy or rice HPP will cause price increase paddy and rice on the market. So we are need to study more in depth. This research become more interesting with the discussion about the goverment’s paddy dan rice purchase price policy in Sawit Boyolali uses central dan vertical model with weaknesses and advantages.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherISETH 2018 (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)id_ID
dc.titleThe Factors of Performance Effectiveness of The Government's Paddy and Rice Purchase Price Policy in Sawit Boyolaliid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record