Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSunarti, S
dc.contributor.authorSusilo, Totok
dc.contributor.authorSriyanto, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T06:29:08Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T06:29:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAdzani, A. H. dan D. Martani. 2014. Pengaruh Kesejahteraan Masyarakat, Faktor Politik dan Ketidakpatuhan Regulasi Terhadap Opini Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. SNA 17 Mataram. Lombok: Universitas Mataram 24-27 Sept 2014. Diakses Tanggal 15 Desember 2015. Ahrens, Thomas, dan Ferry, Laurence. 2014. Newcastle City Council and The Grassroots: Accountability and Budgeting under Austerity. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. Vol. 28. Iss 6 pp. 909-933. Diakses Tanggal 10 Desember 2015. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. 2010. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun 2009. . 2011. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2010. . 2012. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2011. . 2013. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2012. . 2014. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2013. . 2015. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2014. . 2015. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2015. . 2015. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2016. . 2015. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun2017. Damodar N. Gujarati and Dawn C. Porter. 2012. Dasar–dasar Ekonometrika. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Jensen, M dan W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Magerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.Diakses Tanggal 10 Desember 2015 Martani, Dwi. Zaelani, Fadzri. 2011. Pengaruh Ukuran, Pertumbuhan, Dan Kompleksitas Terhadap Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah Daerah. SNA 15. Aceh. Universitas Syah Kuala. Diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2015. Myring, Mark dan Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe. 2010. Corporate Governance and The Quality of Financial Disclosures. The International Business & Economics Research Journal; Juni 2010; 9, 6; pg. 103. Miller, D. Sardais, C.2011.Angel Agent:Agency Theory Reconsidered. Academy of Management Perspectives.Vol. 25 Issue 2, p6-13. 8p.Diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2015. Nurdiono. 2014. Analisis Hasil Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Seluruh Indonesia. Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan. Yogyakarta:Universitas Gajah Mada. Nurdiono. Halim, A. Sugiri, S. 2015. Pengaruh Prooporsi Anggaran dan Faktor Non Keuangan pada Hasil Audit LKPD di seluruh Indonesia. SNA 18 Medan. Universitas Sumatera Utara 16- 19 September 2015. Diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2015 Robinson, R. 2006. Corruption, collusion and nepotism after Suharto: Indonesia’s past or future? IIAS Newsletter 40.Diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2015. Sutaryo, dan Winarna, Jaka. 2013. Karakteristik DPRD dan Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah: Dukungan Empiris dari Perspektif Teori Keagenan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVI Manado. www.bpk.go.idwww.kemendagri.go.idwww.antikorupsi.orgid_ID
dc.identifier.issn2615-1588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/11812
dc.description.abstractThe trend of corruption cases by regional heads and members of the Regional House of Representatives increased after the reform. In 2004-2017 there were 392 Regional Heads involved in legal issues, the largest number of corruption cases were 313 cases. Indonesia consists of 34 provinces with diverse demographic structures and also various public problems. The research objective was to analyze the effect of misuse of public budgets on the level of corruption in Indonesia. A large enough of public budget tends to trigger corruption in Indonesia. This research is useful for regional governments to be more transparent and accountable in the use of public budgets. In addition, this research is useful for policy makers to make better control tools. The data collection consisting of regional government financial reports that have been audited by the Supreme Audit Board in Indonesia. Reports LG financial reports will be analyzed to determine the amount of public budget in each region, the amount of regional loss from regulatory non-compliance and the level of corruption in Indonesia. This research applied panel data using the help of Eviews 8 application for data processing. The results of this research indicated that the public budgeting does not affect the level of corruption in the local government of Indonesiain. In this study the public budget is measured by the amount of funds or costs for the public, so it does not affect the level of corruption. The amount of funds budgeted to the public does not affect the level of corruption. corruption of public budgets is influenced by transparency and accountability in the use of public budgets.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherISETH 2019 (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)id_ID
dc.titleCorruption and Public Budgeting in The Local Government in Indonesiaid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record