| dc.identifier.citation | Arifa’I, Proposal Bisnis, Personal Franchise ( Waralaba Pribadi ) Bentuk Usaha Alternatif Menjadi Jutawan Dalam Waktu Relatif Singkat, L4L Press, Surakarta, 2004 Hadi, Soestrisno, Metodologi Research, Jilid II, Yayasan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum / Psikologi Universitas Gajahmada, Yogyakarta, 2004 Maharam, S., Waralaba, Alternatif Strategi Ekspansi Paling Murah, Smfr@Nchise Roni Hanintjo, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 1994 Soekanto, Soejono, Perpektif Teoritis Studi Hukum dalam Masyarakat, PT. Rajawali, Jakarta, 2006. Suryanto, Edy HP, Tinjauan Legal Normatif Fanchise/Waralaba Di Indonesia, tesis, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, 2008 Wafiya, Pola Hubunga Hukum Kemitraan Melalui Bisnis Frinchise Di Kota Bengkulu, tesis, Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Banten, 2005 Widjaja, Gunawan, Lisensi atau Waralaba Suatu Panduan Praktis, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims: (1) To describe the relationships between legal subjects
involved in franchising agreement in Smartgama tutoring agency, Karanganyar
district. (2) To describe the legal covering the activity of Smartgama Tutoring
Agency. (3) To explore the ideal model of the franchise agreement in the field of
education.
This study took place in the Smartgama Tutoring Agency, at Perintis
Kemerdekaan street No 5 Jetis Karanganyar. The method used is a normative
juridical approach. Techniques of data analysis are descriptive qualitative. Data
collected is then analyzed to obtain clarity of problem solving, inductive reasoning
and drawing the conclusions.
Results of the study are: 1) The regulations of legal relations in the franchise
agreement are on: the name and address of the agency types of intellectual property
rights; business activities; rights and obligations of the agency; aid facilities,
operational guidance, training, and marketing of the franchisor to the granted
franchisee; areas of business; term of the agreement; manner of payment of
remuneration; ownership, change of ownership, and heir; settlement of disputes;
renewal procedures, termination, and severance agreements. 2) If a franchise
agreement in Smartgama Karanganyar is protection for the franchisor in terms of:
Payment of compensation; cancellation of the agreement; Resolution. There is no
protection for the franchisee in terms of: transitional risks and intellectual property
rights. 3) The agreement is ideal in terms of the franchise: franchisor must register
its intellectual property rights of “smartgama” trademark, rights and obligations of
the parties should be spelled out in detail and are made in a separate article. The
responsibilities of the parties in the event of overmatch should be included in
separate article of franchise agreement. | en_US |
