| dc.identifier.citation | Abdurrahman, Dudung. 1999. Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Jakarta: logos Wacana Ilmu. Alfian, Teuku Ibrahim, [t.t.h.]. Metode dan Metodologi Sejarah, Makalah Seminar Nasional. Jakarta: Panitia. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1989. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Hadi, Sutrisno. 1987. Metode Research. Jogjakarta: Gadjah Mada Press. http:// www.wikimedia.com Jainuri, Ahmad. 1991. Muhammadiyah Gerakan Reformasi Islam di Jawa Abad Keduapuluh. Jakarta: Bina Ilmu. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1989. “Metode Penggunaan Bahan Dokumen”, dalam Koentjaraningrat, Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia. Koentjoroningarat. 1989. “Metode Wawancara”, dalam Koentjoroningrat, Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia. Kuntowijoyo.1995. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Bentang. Muhadjir, Noeng. 1998. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin. Noer, Deliar. 1980. Gerakan Modern Islam di Indonesia 1900-1942. Jakarta: LP3ES. Panitia Musyran Plompong. 2008. Laporan Pertanggung jawaban NU Ranting Plompong. Brebes: Panitia. Warsidi, Slamet, 1989. Fiqh Indonesia dalam Tantangan. Surakarta: FAI UMS Royyani, A. 2005. Selayang Pandang Ranting Muhammadiyah Plompong: dari Masa ke Masa (Sebuah Harapan Dan Realita). Brebes: Perguruan Muhammadiyah Ranting Plompong. Republika, Ahad 23 Oktober 201. Singarimbun , Irawati. 1987. “Teknik Wawancara”, dalam Masri Singarimbun dan Sofian Effendi (ed.), Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1987. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Muhammadiyah is known as a modern organization and
Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) is labeled as traditional, but both are members of
Islamic organizations and charities that have a substantial business in
Indonesia, whose presence is a historical necessity. The birth and
development of the two organizations in the arena of national and state
has contributed significantly to the nation of Indonesia. Institutionally,
both have an organizational structure in almost all parts of Indonesia,
from the center to the branch. Field concern is also not much different,
namely religious, social and education and health. Therefore They do not
rule out the potential conflict, but also can work together to do something
useful for the people and nation. In Plompong Village, both organizations
are well developed, but both have differences and similarities. | en_US |
