dc.contributor.author | Perkasa, Muchamad Abubakar Ryan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-14T08:28:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-12-14T08:28:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Jakarta: Reneka Cipta). Gazalba, Sidi. 1977. Pandangan Islam tentang Kesenian (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang). _______, Sidi. 1978. Asas Kebudayaan Islam , (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang). Harsojo. 1977. Pengantar Antropologi (Jakarta: Bina Cipta). Ishomuddin. 1997. Sosiologi: Perspektif Islam, (Malang: UMM Press). Koentjaraningrat. 1979. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi (Jakarta: Akasara Baru). Kuntowijoyo. 1995. “Muhammadiyah Sebagai Gerakan Kebudayaan Tanpa Kebudayaan atau Satu Lagi Alasan Mengapa NU dan Muhammadiyah Harus Bersatu”. Muhammadiyah dan Pemberdayaan Rakyat, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka). Mardimin. 1994. Jangan Tangisi Tradisi, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius). Maryadi. 1998. Reaktualisasi Tajdid MuhammadiyahMulkan, Abdul Munir. 1990. Pemikiran K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Dan Muhammadiyah, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara). Nazir, Mohammad. 1998. Metode Penelitian (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia). PP Muhammadiyah. 1995. Keputusan Muktamar Muahmmadiyah 43 Beserta Makalah Prasarannya , (Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah). _______. 2005. Dakwah Kultural Muhammadiyah , (Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah). _______. 2005. Pedoman Hidup Islam Warga Muhammadiyah (Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah). Suara Muhammadiyah. “Strategi Kebudayaan Muhammadiyah”. 1-15 Februari 2006. Halaman 6. Sudarto. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Filsalat (Jakarta: Raha Grafindo Persada). Suriasumantri, Jujun S.. 1990. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan). Thoyibi, M (Ed). 2003. Sinergi Agama dan Budaya Lokal: Dialektika Muhammadiyah dan Seni Lokal. Surakarta: MUP-UMS. Zubair, Charis dan Bakker, Anton. 1990. Metode Penelitian Filsafat (Yogyakarta: Kanisius). | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1693-3389 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/2358 | |
dc.description.abstract | Since the beginning of Muhammadiyah firmly positioned itself
as a movement of purification. Such movement patterns, making the
Muhammadiyah as if to have distance with the culture. Culture seemed
to be far from the values of Islam. Further, due to religion and culture
can not possibly synergistic.
To open the deadlock of this purification step movement, the
Muhammadiyah conduct internal criticism and self improvement.
Muhammadiyah conscious need to conduct a review of the notion of
culture that had been held. The realization is reflected by the scheduled
programming for discussion of cultural issues. Therefore this study
was confined to the period after the Aceh conference of 43rd in Aceh, so
that an item that will be presented in this study is the result of postconference
decision of Muhammadiyah.
An approach in this study is historical-philosophical. With the
approach and methods of analysis, this study seeks to analyze the cultural
view of Muhammadiyah of post-convention of 43rd in Aceh. Results
from the analysis of the research is done by revamping the concept
of Muhammadiyah about culture. and from the improvement of
this concept, the Muhammadiyah successfully determine a strategy to
open a dialogue by form of cultural approach. Subsequent analysis
concluded that with the view of this culture, Muhammadiyah seeks to
transform the culture in society toward a more Islamic life. | en_US |
dc.publisher | LPPM UMS | en_US |
dc.subject | Muhammadiyah | en_US |
dc.subject | culture and cultural transformation | en_US |
dc.title | PANDANGAN MUHAMMADIYAH TENTANG KEBUDAYAAN PASCA MUKTAMAR KE-43 DI ACEH | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |