| dc.contributor.author | Messah, Yunita A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pono, Rohi D. Radja | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krisnayanti, Denik S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-11T11:29:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-06-11T11:29:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anonim. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, Jakarta. Anonim. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Nomor 43 Tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman Kualifikasi Pelelangan Nasional Pekerjaan Jasa Pelaksanaan Konstruksi (Pemborongan), Jakarta. Dharmawan, Harry M. (2006). ”Pengukuran Bobot Kriteria Dokumen Prakualifikasi Pekerjaan Dermaga Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus Pada Pelabuhan Indonesia III).” Tesis Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya. Ervianto, Wulfram. (2003). Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi, Andi ofset, Yogyakarta. Getsemane, Herry. (2008). ”Manajemen Pengendalian Pekerjaan Subkontraktor Berbasis Manajemen Risiko Ditinjau Dari Segi Mutu (Studi Kasus Proyek Jalan Purwakarta Selatan- Plered).” Tugas Akhir, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta. Kuncoro, Agus. (2011). Cara Benar, Mudah, dan Jitu Menang Tender, Wahyumedia, Jakarta. Lavelle, Derek et al. (2007). The Selection Of Subcontractors: Is Price The Major Factor?, School of the Built Environment Northumbria University. Piliando, Romy. (2008). “Identifikasi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penentuan Pemenang Lelang Jasa Konstruksi Proyek Pemerintah Kota Depok.” Tugas Akhir Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta. Shiau, Yan-chyuan et al. (2006). “Use Questionnaire And AHP Techniques To Develop Subcontractor Selection System.” Journal Department of Construction Engineering, Chung Hua University. Soeharto, Imam. (1997). Manajemen Proyek, Erlangga, Jakarta. Tanidjojo, Yohannes. (1999). “Identifikasi Kriteria-Kriteria Prakualifikasi Kontraktor serta Peningkatannya Terhadap Kualifikasi Kontraktor dalam Memenuhi Target Proyek Waktu, Biaya, Kualitas, Keselamatan Kerja.” Tesis Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Sipil Universitas Kristen Petra, Surabaya. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1411- 8904 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/3095 | |
| dc.description.abstract | There are two ways of selecting the subcontractor by the main contractor namely direct and offering selection. The offering
selection is done if only the candidates are more than one and have unclear specification by determining all of the criteria that
should be fulfilled by the candidates. Those criteria are not set up in a written form as selecting the main contractor set up in
Peraturan Presiden No. 54 Tahun 2010. Thus, every main contractor has different criteria in selecting the subcontractor.
Therefore, this study is held in order to find the aspects and criteria used by the main contractors, such as BUMN and national
private companies in selecting the subcontractors. This research used AHP method supported by software expert choice.
There are six aspects in selecting the subcontractors namely: general aspects, financial aspects, technical aspects, managerial
aspects, safety aspects and aspects of the company's reputation. Every aspect has its own criteria and sub criteria. The result
of this research showed that from the BUMN there were 31.6% of financial aspects, 22.6% of technical aspects, 18.9% of
safety aspects, 11.8% of managerial aspects, 9% of company’s reputation aspects, and 6.1% of general aspects. In addition,
the most influential criteria was bid value dealt with 14.5%, while the most influential sub criteria was the lowest bid value
dealt with 12.4%. On the other side, the national private contractors had 27.1% of financial aspects, 18.7% of technical aspects,
17.4% of safety aspects, 15.2% of managerial aspects, 14.5% of company’s reputation aspects, and 7.1% of general
aspects. The most influential criteria was bid value dealt with 9.7% and the lowest bid value for its sub criteria dealt with
8.1%. It simply can be concluded that the BUMN and national private contractors have set different stages of aspects and criteria
in selecting the subcontractors specifically for the safety and managerial aspects. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
| dc.subject | kriteria | en_US |
| dc.subject | subkontraktor | en_US |
| dc.subject | analytic hierarchy process (AHP) | en_US |
| dc.subject | expert choice | en_US |
| dc.title | The Study Of Selecting The Subcontractor Criteria By The Main Contractors Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Kajian Kriteria Pemilihan Subkontraktor Oleh Kontraktor Utama Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
