| dc.identifier.citation | ___________________. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Mc. Clelland, David C. 1961. The Achieving Society. New York: Van Noostrand Reinhold. Riduwan. 2007. Cara Menggunakan dan Memakai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). Bandung: Alfabeta. Sutrisno, Edi. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana. Umar, Husein. 2008. Disain Penelitian MSDM dan Perilaku Karyawan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Usman, Husaini. 2008. Manajemen Teori Praktek dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Utomo, Mulyo. 2007. “Analisis Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Produktivitas Guru SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Demak”, Jurnal Pendidikan. Jilid 16, No. 1, pp. 41-54. Wang, Hsiou. Huai, Bih-Jen Fwu. 2007. “In pursuit of teacher quality in diversity: A Study of the Selection Mechanisms of the New Secondary Teacher Education Programmes in Taiwan”. International Journal of Educational Development 27: 166-181. Wirawan. 2008. Budaya dan Iklim Organisasi. Teori Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this research is to know: (1) organizational climate influence to lecturer
productivity; (2) satisfaction influence work to lecturer productivity; (3) interest influence
to lecturer productivity; (4) motivation influence to lecturer productivity; and (5) influence by
simultaneous between organizational climate, work satisfaction, interest, and motivate to lecturer
productivity. Research Method used is quantitative method by causal design. This research population
is all lecturers remain at Veteran Bangun Nusantara University of Sukoharjo a number of
109 people. Research sample counted 86 one who is taken by using formula from Slovin, and to
each faculty taken by proportional. Data collecting technique uses the questioner. The data are
analyzed by Double Regress. The result indicates that: (1) organizational climate gives positive
and significant influence to lecturer productivity. Level of influence gives a organizational climate
to visible lecturer productivity through the equation of regress Y = 5,105 + 0,505X1; (2) work
satisfaction gives positive and significant influence to lecturer productivity. Level of influence
is a work satisfaction to visible lecturer productivity through the equation of regress Y = 5,105
+ 0,425X2; (3) interest gives positive and significant influence to lecturer productivity. Level of
influence is given by interest to visible lecturer productivity through the equation of regress Y =
5,105 + 0,594X3; (4) motivation positive and significant influence to lecturer productivity. Level
of influence is given by motivation to visible lecturer productivity through the equation of regress
Y = 5,105 + 0,479X4; (5) there is simultaneousness in organizational climate, work satisfaction,
interest, and motivate to have an effect on lecturer productivity. This matter is proved from result
F test, got F calculated 124,802 with the level significance 0,000. Level of influence by simultaneous
are organizational climate, work satisfaction, interest, and motivate to have an effect on to
lecturer productivity is equal to 86%, the rest that is 14% representing incoming influence from
other factor. | en_US |
