Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMardiyana, Mardiyana
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-23T07:38:48Z
dc.date.available2013-11-23T07:38:48Z
dc.date.issued2013-06
dc.identifier.citationAminuddin, 1985. Pengantar Apresiasi Karya Sastra (Ringkasan). Malang : FBS IKIP Malang. Darsono. 2000. Psikologi Belajar. Semarang : IKIP PGRI. Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Dirjen Dikdas. Djoko, Rachmat Pradopo. 1995. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya. Yog yakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. Hamalik, Oemar. 2002. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algesindo. Nasution. S. 1982. Didaktik Asas-asas Mengajar., Bandung : Jinomones. Nurhadi. 1987. Kapasitas Selekta Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Malang : FPBS IKIP Malang. Partini, Siti S. 1980. Psikologi Belajar. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset. Sapardan, Dadang Ahmad, 2009: 1. “Penerapan Model Respons Analisis Dan Model Moody Dalam Pembelajaran Apresiasi Cerita Anak (kajian Eksperimen Terhadap Siswa Kelas Ii Sman Cililin Kabupaten Bandung. http://digilib.upi.edu/pasca/available/etd0210106095101/ Sardiman. 1980. Psikologi Perkembangan. Semarang : IKIP. Sawali, Tuhusetya. 2010. Bahan Ajar Puisi : Antara Tuntutan Kurikulum dan Kepemtingan Apresiasi.http://agupena64@ gmail.com Sudjiman, Panuti. 1988. Memahami Cerita Rekaan. Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya. ________, 1991. Pengantar Novel Indonesia. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti. Sujati. 2000. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Suwandi, Sarwiji dan Madyo Ekousilo. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Surakarta: Panitia Sertifikasi Guru Rayon 13 Surakarta. Teeuw, A. 1983. Membaca dan Menilai Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia. ________,1988. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra, Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya. Tim MKDK. 1990. Psikologi Belajar. Semarang : IKIP PGRI. Triantoni, Teguh. 2010: 1. Problem Pengajaran Sastra di SMK. http://agupena64@ gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.issn0852-0976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/3891
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to describe the students story appreciation achievement through contextual approach in teaching Indonesian at class VIIA SMP Negeri 3 Teras Boyolali 2011/2012. Subject and data source are 35 students. Data are collected by observation, documentation, and test. Data analysis uses critical and comprehensive analysis. The improvements are measured by KKM 65 from 100%. This is an action research done by two cycles. The results show that there is a progress on teaching and learning, the progess is 12.8%. It is obtained from cycle I (71,4%) then on cycle II 92,9%. Seceond result shows that there is a progress on teaching class praperation. The progress is 24%, from pra cycle to cycle I, then 14% from cylce I to cycle II. The third result deals with optimizing motivation. It shows that there is an increase about 42,9 % from pra cycle to cycle I and 5,7% from cycle I to cycle II. The fourth result deals with completed study. The running increase is pra cycle (62,5%), cycle I (67,5%), and cycle II (100%). From all results can be concluded that a good preperation will affect to learning progress of Indonesian subject.en_US
dc.publisherLPPM UMSen_US
dc.subjectcompleted learningen_US
dc.subjectstudents storyen_US
dc.subjectcontextual learningen_US
dc.titlemePENINGKATAN KETERAMPILAN MENGAPRESIASI CERITA ANAK MELALUI PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA PADA SISWA KELAS VII A SMP NEGERI 3 TERAS KABUPATEN BOYOLALI SEMESTER GENAP TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record