Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorListyawan, Anto Budi
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-20T06:51:55Z
dc.date.available2013-12-20T06:51:55Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBaecher, G.B. and Christian, J.T. (2003). Reliability and Stratistics in peotechnical Engineering, 1 st ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England. Farrington, P.A., Nembhard, H.B., Sturrock, D.T. and Evans, G.W. (1999). Defining a beta distribution function for construction simulation. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, 1010-1015. Fenton, G.A. (1999). Random field modeling of CPT data. ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineerng, 125, 486-498. Fenton, G.A. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (2003). Random field characterization of NGES data. Geotechnical Special Publications, 121, 61-78. Hogg, V. and Ledolter, J. (1987). Applied Statistics for Engineers and Physical Scientists, 2 nd ed. New York Jefferies, M.G., Rogers, B.T., Griffin, K.M. and Been, K. (1988a). Characterization of sandfills with the cone penetration test. ICE Proceedings of the Geotechnology Conference, Birmingham, 199-202. Lee, I.K., White, W. and Ingles, O.G. (1983). Geotechnical Engineering. Pitman publishing, Ltd, England. Limpert, E., Stahel, W.A. and Abbt, M. (2001). Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues. Bioscience, 51, 341-352. Lumb, P. (1966). The variability of natural soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 3, 74-97. Lumb, P. (1970). Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 7, 225-242. Onisiphorou, C. (2000). Stochastic analysis of saturated soils using finite elements. PhD. Thesis, University of Manchester, UK. Phoon, K.K. and Kulhawy, F.H. (1999). Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 612-624. Robertson, P.K. (1986). In-situ testing and its application to foundation engineering. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 23, 573-594. Robertson, P.K. and Campanella, R.G. (1983). Interpretation of cone penetration tests: Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20, 718-733. Tappin, R.G.R., Duivendijk, J.V. and Haque, M. (1998). The design and construction of Jamuna bridge, Bangladesh. Proceeding of Institution of Civil Engineering, 126, 150-162. Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.H. and Myers, S.L. (1998). Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 6 th ed. New Jersey Wong, S.Y. (2004). Stochastic characterization and reliability of saturated soils. PhD. Thesis, University of Manchester, UK. Yoshimine, M., Robertson, P.K. and Wride, C.E. (1999). Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 891-906.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-979-636-118-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4027
dc.description.abstractGeotechnical variability is a complex attribute that results from many disparate sources of uncertainties. It is strongly dependent on the properties of the soil beneath and adjacent to the structure of interest. Probabilistic models began more realistic design compare to the old deterministic design as it can describe and take account of soil variability. Although the deterministic approach is widely used, it is well known, that almost all natural soils are spatially variable in their properties and rarely homogenous. This paper focuses on the preliminary analysis to prepare the probabilistic analysis of Pile Foundation design by characterizing the tip resistance dan sleeve friction for 6 CPTs data taken from Ibis Hotel Surakarta. It involves an extensive analysis to perform the best-fit distribution of pointwise variability of tip resistance and sleeve friction using computer program written in MATLAB and FORTRAN. Finally, the point statistics (i.e. mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation) across the site were derived together with the interpretation of the possibility of the existence of different materials. The results show that, there is no objection to the hypothesis of normality in the chi-square analysis, although the best fit distribution for each profile or 6 profiles which collected at once are varying (i.e.normal, log-normal, gamma, beta. When all tip resistance data are collected at once, the mean and standard deviation is 42.02 kg/cm2 and 40 kg/cm2 respectively. The mean and standard deviation of all sleeve friction data is 1.02 kg/cm2 and 0.8 kg/cm2 respectively. The coefficient of variation of tip resistance and sleeve friction tend to be skewed as its value is high (i.e. 0.95 and 0.78 respectivel).en_US
dc.subjectchi-squareen_US
dc.subjectdeterministicen_US
dc.subjectprobabilisticen_US
dc.subjecttip resistanceen_US
dc.subjectvariabilityen_US
dc.titleStatistical Characterization of Cone Penetration Test Variability for Ibis Hotel Soilen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record