Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnif, Sofyan
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-19T06:10:10Z
dc.date.available2014-02-19T06:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citation___________. 2004. Uji Kompetensi Guru Nasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. ___________, 2012. Badan Pengembangan SDM Pendidikan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidi- kan: Analisis Data Hasil UKA Tahun 2012. Baedowi, 2009. Kajian Implementasi Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan. Makalah Seminar di Universitas Negeri Jakarta. BNSP. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta. Debling, G. 1995. “The Employment Department Training Agency Standarts Program: Im- plications for Education”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and training. London-New York-Philadelphia: The Farmer Press.h. 77-94. Echols, J.M. dan Shadily, H. 2002. Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Cetakan XXVI. Kenezevich, S.J. 1984. Administration of Public Education. New York: Harper Collin Publisher. Jones, James J. dan Walters, Donald L. 2008. Human Resources Management in Education (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Q – Media. Malik, Rizal. 2010. Indonesia dan Human Development Index. Makalah Disampaikandalam Seminar tentang Prospek Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia dalam Era Globalisasi Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kampus Universitas Indonesia. November. Muhroji & Fathoni, Ahmad. 2006. Manajemen Pendidikan. Surakarta: FKIP UMS. Mulyasa, E. 2012.Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Musfah, J. 2011. Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru: Melalui Pelatihan dan Sumber Belajar, Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: KencanaPrenada Media Grup. Sagala, Syaiful. 2007. Administrasi Pendidikan Kontemporer. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sanusi, A. (2007). Fakta, Kebijakan, Ilmu, Filsafah Pendidikan. Bahan Perkuliahan. Bandung: PPS UNINUS. Saud, Udin Saefudin. 2009. Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Penerbit: Alfabeta, Bandung. Sugiyono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sukmadinata, N. sy. (2006). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Cetakan ke-8. Bandung: Rosdakarya. Tuxworth, E. 1995. “Competency based Education and Training: Background and Origins”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed). Competency Based Education and Training. London-New YorkPhiladelphia: The Falmer Press.h. 10-25. Wolf, A. 1995. “Can Competence and Knowledge Mix?” dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and Training. London-New York-Philadelphia: The Falmer Press. h. 39-53en_US
dc.identifier.issn0852-0976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4307
dc.description.abstractAs stated in UU No. 14, 2005 and PP No. 74, 2008 that teachers as proffessional educator have to possess four competences, namely: pedagogic, proffessional, character, and social. However the condition in Indonesia is not like that. In general, they are in low category, specifically in pedagogic and proffessional. Those conditions happen in biology teachers and other teacher subjects. Then the aim of this study is to observe the profile of biology teachers especially their proffessional competence pasca sertification in Surakarta residance. The population of this study is all biology teachers (332 persons) that have rechieved sertification through direct, portofolio, and PLPG program. Purposive random sampling is used to get 116 teachers. Data are collected by depth interview, documentation, and test, then the collected data are analysed by descriptive qualitative. The result shows that the profile of proffessional competence of biology teachers can be grouped into three: low, middle, and high. The teachers are low in: concept implementation, using tool of measurements, biology experiment planning, using the result of reflection, self reflection, understanding the principles and theories of savety work, doing action research, and understanding the steps of biology experiement correctly. The teachers are middle in: understanding the objective of the study, creative and innovative in implementing and developing science of biology nad correlated sciences, undesrtanding thinking process of biology, using symbolic language, undesrtanding standard competence, and understanding the scoupe of biology. They are high in: understanding the structure biology science and its correlation, selecting the material, cooking the material creatively, understanding the concepts, laws, and biology theories, undesrtanding the history of the natural science, specifically biology, understanding the basic competence of the subject or topic, updating their knowledge from many sources, and rationally qualitatively and quantitatively in understanding the process and biology law.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectproffessional competenceen_US
dc.subjectbiology teachersen_US
dc.subjectpost teachers certificationen_US
dc.titleProfil Kompetensi Profesional Guru Mapel Biologi Pasca Sertifikasi di Karesidenan Surakartaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record