Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanif
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T03:52:33Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T03:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2005-08
dc.identifier.citationBaron, R. A. dan Byrne, D., 1991. Social Psychology. Understanding Human Interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc. Baumrind, D. 1971. Current, Patterns of Parental. Authority Development-Psychology. Monograph 4 No.1. Berkowitz, L., 1995. Agresi, Sebab, dan Akibatnya. Terj. Hartati Woro Susianti. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Binaan Pressindo. Blum, M. L.,1956. Industrial Psychology and It’s Social Foundation. New York: Harper Publisher. Buss, A., 1973. Psychology, Man in Perspective. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc. Gunarsa, S. D., dan Gunarsa, Y. S. D., 1996. Psikologi untuk Membimbing. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia. Haryanta, 2000. “Studi Eksploratif tentang Profile Klien yang Memanfaatkan Jasa Pelayanan Psikologis di Biro Konsultasi Psikologi Yogyakarta”. Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM. Hadinoto, S.R. 1979. Achivement, Motivation, Parent Education Level And Child Rearing Practice In Four Ocenfational Group, Disertasi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM. Hernowo (Ed), 2002. Aa Gym dan Fenomena Daarut Tauhid: Memperbaiki Diri dengan Manajemen Qalbu. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama (MMU). Hurlock, E.B., 1973. Adolescent Development. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill, Kogakhusa Ltd. Kedaulatan Rakyat. 2002. “Salah Satu Pelaku pengeroyokan Siswa SMU Tertangkap”, Kedaulatan Rakyat: 10 Juli 2002. Koeswara, E., 1988. Agresi Manusia. Bandung: PT Eresco. Lazarus, R. S.,1976. Pattern of Adjustment. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha. Manulang. 1991. Manajemen Personalia. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia. Verawati, A., 2001. “Agresivitas Remaja Ditinjau dari Jenis Strategi Menghadapi Masalah di Daerah Pembangunan Pemukiman dan Bukan Daerah Pembangunan Pemukiman”. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1411-5190
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/457
dc.description.abstractThis research aims at examining the difference of aggressiveness among students of Muhammadiyah 1 Senior High-School (SMU Muhammadiyah 1) Yogyakarta based on the upbringing patters and parent’s occupation. The subjects of the research include seventy six students of first year, sixty seven students of second year, and the subjects’ parents. The data-collecting methods are questionnaire and interview. The quantitative data are analyzed by means of the two-way Variance Analysis and the qualitative data are analyzed by means of qualitative analysis. The outcome of the research shows the following conclusions: (1) there is a significant difference of aggressiveness in the three upbringing patterns, namely authoritarian pattern = 69.344; democratic pattern = 79.283; and permissive pattern = 87.862; (2) there is no significant difference of aggressiveness in the three kinds of parents occupation, namely: entrepreneur = 77.632; civil servant = 76.436; military = 76.960; and (3) permissive pattern is the most influential cause of students’ aggressiveness.en_US
dc.subjectpola asuh orang tuaen_US
dc.subjectpekerja orang tuaen_US
dc.subjectagresivitasen_US
dc.titlePERBEDAAN TINGKAT AGRESIVITAS PADA SISWA SMU MUHAMMADIYAH I YOGYAKARTA BERDASAR PADA POLA ASUH DAN JENIS PEKERJAAN ORANG TUAen_US
dc.title.alternativeDIFFERENCE OF AGGRESSIVENESS AMONG STUDENTS OF SMU MUHAMMADIYAH 1 YOGYAKARTA BASED ON THE UPBRINGING PATTERNS AND PARENTS’ OCCUPATIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record