dc.identifier.citation | Bank Mandiri. 2008. Calculation of Financial Ratios Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2009. Calculation of Financial Ratios Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2010. Calculation of Financial Ratios Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2011. Calculation of Financial Ratios Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2012. Calculation of Financial Ratios Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2008. Annual Report Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2009. Annual Report Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2010. Annual Report Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2011. Annual Report Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Bank Mandiri. 2012. Annual Report Mandiri Bank (online), (http://www.bankmandiri.co.id, diakses tanggal 20 April 2013). Dendawijaya, Lukman. 2000. Manajemen Perban-kan. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia. Dendawijaya, Lukman. 2009. Manajemen Per-bankan, edisi kedua. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia. Ghozali, Imam. 2002. Aplikasi Analisis Multi-variate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometric, edisi keempat. New York : McGrawHill. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika. Jakarta : Erlangga. Hanafi, Mahmudah dan Abdul Halim. 2009. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Cetakan Pertama, edisi keempat. Yogyakarta : Unit Penerbitan dan Percetakan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN. Kasmir. 2003. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Kasmir. 2008. Manajemen Perbankan. Edisi Revisi 2008. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Mirany, Dewi. 2012. Pengaruh CAR, BOPO dan LDR Terhadap ROA (Pada Bank BUMN Yang Go Public di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2004-2011). Program Sarjana Ekonomi Universitas Hasanuddin. Makas-sar: Universitas Hansanuddin, (tidak dipublikasikan). Modul. 2011. Komputer Statistik, Team Labora-torium Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi UMS. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadi-yah Surakarta, (tidak dipublikasikan). Mudrajad, Kuncoro. 2002. Manajemen Perbankan: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta : BPFE. Nachrowi Djalal. 2007. Penggunaan teknik eko-nometri : pendekatan populer dan praktis dilengkapi teknik analisis dan pengolahan data dengan menggunakan paket program SPSS. Jakarta : Grafindo Persada. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.5 / 8 / PBI / 2003, Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum. Prasnanugraha, Pontti. 2007. Analisis Pengaruh Rasio-Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum di Indonesia. TESIS Program Pascasarjana Magister Sains Akuntansi Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang : Uni-versitas Diponegoro, (tidak dipublikasi-kan). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to determine the impact of the Capital Adequacy Ratio ( CAR ) , Loan to Deposit Ratio ( LDR ) and Net Interest Margin ( NIM ) of the Return on Assets ( ROA ) at PT . Bank Mandiri ( Persero ) Tbk . The data used in this study comes from the banks concerned . The data taken in the form of secondary data obtained through the banking statistics quarterly financial report of PT . Bank Mandiri ( Persero ) Tbk in Indonesia during 2008-2012.
The analytical method used consists of multiple regression analysis , the classical assumption , hypothesis testing ( t test and F test ) and test the coefficient of determination . From the results of this study concluded that based on regression analysis obtained the following equation : Y = 6.342 + 0.008 + 0.044 XI X2 - 1.176 X3 . In the classical assumption test found a problem in the autocorrelation test , whereas the normality test, multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity test there is a problem in the model .
Based on the hypothesis testing , the F test is known that jointly ( simultaneously ) variable CAR , NIM and LDR significant effect on ROA . While the t test ( partial testing ) , variable CAR and NIM has no effect on ROA . While variable LDR dominant and significant positive effect on ROA | en_US |