Model Grosse Akta Pengakuan Hutang dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Kreditur Studi Kasus pada Lembaga Keuangan BUMN/ BUMD di Kabupaten Klaten

Abstract

Demand of settlement of a dispute, especially in the business affair not only expect the completion of a simple, rapid, and low cost, but also expect to complete immediately, so it can enclose remedies (appeal and judicial review) as well as have the power executorial. Basically dispute resolution begins with the lawsuit, but in some cases there are exceptions. A dispute can be executed directly without having to go through trial stages, as the verdict was final and binding which are the grosse the acknowledgment of debt. Grosse or the acknowledgment of debt is strong evidence for the creditors in order to refund receivable. However, in practice, grosse experiences many obstacles. This occurs because of differences in interpretation between officials grosse maker (notary) with officials of the executor (the chairman of the district court) . That case continues until today, where in practice grosse agency debt has not got a certificate of recognition proper place. Therefore, this study will answer the following problems (1)How the implementation of the lending agreement with a financial institution state enterprises in Klaten district? (2) How the implementation of the underwriting agreement with a financial institution state enterprises in Klaten district? (3) How the settlement of debt if the debtor default on SOE financial enterprises in Klaten district? (4) How grosse models that can protect the interests of creditors? This research is an empirical juridical. The data obtained through interviews and literature. Therefore, the data were analyzed using a qualitative approach. This study argues that the model of Grosse, the acknowledgement of Debt that can protect the interests of creditors, because it has the power of executorial