dc.contributor.author | Dinariana, Dwi | |
dc.contributor.author | Misja, Undang | |
dc.contributor.author | Rahardjo, Hary Agus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-22T08:25:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-22T08:25:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aly, M. A., 2004. Perkerasan Jalan Beton dan Aspal di Dunia Konstruksi, Bandung, PT. Dana Sejahtera. Anoraga, Pandji. 1995. BUMN Swasta dan Koperasi. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya. Ari.S.P., Mulya.A.A. 2008.Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan di Perguruan Tinggi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November: hal. 1-14. Haas and Meixneer, An Illustrated Guide to the Analytical Hierarchy Process, http://www.boku.ac.at/mi/ Ibrahim R. 1997. Prospek BUMN dan Kepentingan Umum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya bakti. Mulyono, Sri. 1996. Teori Pengambilan Keputusan. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Saaty, T.L.2000, Fundamental Of Decision Making and Priority Theory With The Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Pittsburgh, RWS publication. Supranto. J. 1992. Teknik Sampling untuk survei dan eksperimen. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789796361544 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4911 | |
dc.description.abstract | This research specially apply AHP method (Analitycal Hierarchy Process) for feasibility compare estimation
construction clear a root among concrete and asphalt road for strategical project East serang City – KP3B one that will
be built by on duty Public Work Banten Province. Expected via this research gets to be proven that method AHP can
applied deep tech area and engineering, so gets to help taker policy in processes objective decision making especially
at governance environment. Downloading in this research utilize meaty questionare method which gets bearings with
technical factor, non technical and cost that is utilized to assess feasibility a road to Owner respondent, Contractor,
Consultant, Academician an Society. From analysis already been done by Expert Choice’s program and manual
calculation is is gotten usufructs : 1) within technical factor that, resistence factor to reputed weather most important in
assess construction feasibility clear a root, 2) within factors non technical surface convenience factor looking on to
constitute factor most important in assess construction feasibility clears a root, 3) within cost factors, development cost
factor looking on to constitute factor most important in assess construction feasibility clear a root. Analisis’s result the
end bases 9 factor that was involved by that better concrete construction against which asphalt construction.. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
dc.subject | Feasibility | en_US |
dc.subject | AHP | en_US |
dc.subject | oads construction | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis Feasibility Asphalt Pavement And Concrete Pavement With Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method | en_US |