| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Spies, et al, “SWM GHG Calculator – a Tool for Calculating Greenhouse Gases in Solid Waste Management, Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), 2010. [2] Central Board of Statistic of Makassar, “Makassar in figures 2010,” unpublished [3] Kastaman, et al, “Rancangan Pengembangan Sistem Pengelolaan Reaktor Sampah Terpadu (SILARSATU)”, Simposium Kebudayaan Indonesia - Malaysia VIII (SKIM VIII) 2002. [4] I.R.Rahim,Nakayama and Shimaoka, “Cost Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Major Indonesian Cities”, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Ser. G(Environmental Research),Vol.Vol. 68,No.No.6,pp.II-79-89,2012.10 [5] Rahim, Shimaoka, Nakayama, “Development of life cycle replacement cost methods to estimate the environmental cost of Municipal Solid Waste management in developing countries”, Proc. of the 12th Expert Meeting on Solid Waste Management in Asia and Pacific Island (SWAPI),2013.02. [6] WARP, “Waste Recovery Quick Wins, Practical solutions for sustainable construction”, Waste & Resources Action Programme, ISBN: 1-84405- 352-0, pp.12 [7] CARMA, Carbon Monitoring for Action http://www.carma.org/region/detail/1622786 [8] Handoko, Y, “Analisis ulang Kelayakan Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah Putri Cempo Solo”, Thesis Undergraduate, Industrial Technology Faculty, Atma Jaya Jogyakarta, 2009 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Makassar city produced 0.38 Mt/year of Municipal
Solid Waste (MSW) with population number of 1.398 million and
waste generation rate 0.74 kg/cap/day. Almost 89% MSW are
transported to Tamangapa Landfill as the only landfill in use
recently without treatment, although Tamangapa landfill
designed as a sanitary landfills in operation still open dumping
and unmanaged will become a source of the GHGs emission,
mainly the methane emission. This study have developed 3
(three) scenarios of existing conditions (BAU), scenarios were: 1st
scenarios called Communal Waste Processing (CWP), this
scenario is intended to reduce the volume of waste to be dumped
to landfills, 2nd scenarios called Integrated Waste Processing
Center (IWPC), developed an integrated waste processing (both
organic and inorganic) facility on ward (kecamatan) level and 3rd
scenarios called Development Landfill System (DLS), this
scenario is actually similar to BAU condition, assumed the on-site
landfills (Tamangapa) previously just controlled type developed
to a sanitary type that has a mechanical and biological treatment
facilities and methane gas processing facilities. Using SWM-GHG
Calculator was developed by IFEU Institute that follows the Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The best scenarios regarding
mitigation costs were SCR1 (US$ 5.3/ tCO2-eq) followed by
SCR2 and SCR3, because total comparison between the costs
incurred by results of reduction of GHG emissions on BAU
conditions. | en_US |
