dc.contributor.author | Susihono, Wahyu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-03T08:08:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-03T08:08:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Budiman. Santi. 2003. Implementation of Technometric to improve competitiveness of company, case study in PT Parahyanga . Opini Ekonomi dan Bisnis Aktual (OPTIMAL). Jurnal Volume 1 Nomer 1. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Isti Ekatana Upaweda. Yogyakarta. [2] Cagan, J. and Vogel CM. 2002. Creating Breakthrough Products – Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval. Prenctice Hall. New Jersey [3] Cohen, Lou. 2005. Quality Function Deployment : How to Make QFD Work for You. Addison – Wesley Publishing Company. Massachusetts [4] Gunawan. Herawati L. tt. Application of Scoring with AHP in modellin Leranng System ; Case Study in Industrial Engineering Major. Property of M. Arif Darmawan. Universitas Surabaya. [5] Kroemer, K.H.E. 1994. Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency. Prentice Hall. New Jersey [6] Nurmiyanto, Eko. 2001. Ergonomic, Basic Concept and Its Application. Gunawidya [7] Pulat, B.M. 1992. Fundamentals of Industrial Ergonomics. Prentice Hall Internasional. Englewood Cliffs-New Jersey [8] Ramdhani, Ali. 2000. Supporting Decission System: A Discource of Structural Idealism and Implementation of Decission Making Concept, Cetakan ke-dua. PT Remaja Perdakarya. Bandung. [9] Susihono, Wahyu. 2008. Redesigning Strecher Matress By Addition of Facility Considering Ergonomic an Optimizing function. Jurusan Teknik Industri;FT Untirta. Cilegon. [10] Sutjana, I.D.P, Adiputra, N. Manuaba, A. Neill, O.D, 1999. Improvement of Sickle Quality through Ergonomic Participatory Approach at Batunya Village Tabanan Regency. Journal of Occupational Health. P. 41: 131–135 [11] Ulrich, KT. and Eppinger.1995, Product Design and Development. McGraw Hill. Inc New York [12] Widodo, D. 2003. Product Design and Development UII Press Indonesia. Yogyakarta [13] Wignjosoebroto,S.1995.” Ergonomy Motion and Time Study”. PT Candimas Metropolis. Jakarta. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2407-4330 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4990 | |
dc.description.abstract | Community creative industry based on metal as the
raw material recently has been growing rapidly, for example
manufacturing of farming equipment such as hoe, sickle, knife,
or others household equipment. The capacities of these creative
industries are depended on ability of industry in providing raw
material and ability in adopting technology. The higher adopting
technology, then industry will have much opportunity to compete
in global market. Even though these industries have ability to
compete in global market, most of these creative industries have
not understand about the mapping of technology adoption
developed. This condition make them difficult in determining
strategy of short term or long term business development. This
condition will affect to profit that will be earned.In this research,
there will be survey to five metal industries by using
questionnaire, those are: (A) Technometric, that is assessment of
sophistication of technoware, humanware, inforware, and
organware. The weighting of each component is determined by
state of the art rating, while normalization and calculation of
total contribution are by making map of relation of each
component. (B) data compilation of pair weighted comparative,
consistency ratio of each respondent, and geometric average
calculation. Data processing is using "pairwise comparison"
approach. The result shows that Score of five metal industries for
Technology Contribution Coefficient (TCC) Technoware,
Humanware, Inforware dan Organware consecutively are:
A=0.415; 0.465; 0.41; 0.40, B=0.474; 0.414; 0.41; 0.45, C=0.488;
0.42; 0.38; 0.42, D=0.481; 0.34; 0.37; 0.38, and E=0.479; 0.41;
0.37; 0.37. A industry has excellence in Organware-Inforware, C
industry has excellence in Technoware – Humanware –
Organware, D Industry has excellence in Technoware, while E
industry has excellence in Humanware. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
dc.subject | coefficient contribution | en_US |
dc.subject | metal industry | en_US |
dc.subject | creative community | en_US |
dc.title | Technology Assessment To Determine Total Contribution Of Coefficient, Technoware, Humanware, Inforware, And Organware In Metal Industry Of Creative Community | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |