| dc.identifier.citation | Djelantik, 1990, Pengantar Dasar Ilmu Estetika, Sekolah Tinggi Seni Indonesia, Denpasar. Lang, Jhon, 1987, Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design, VNR, New York. Mega, Voula, 1996, “Our City our Future: Toward Sustainable Development in European Cities” dalam Jurnal Environment and Urbanization. 8, Sage Publication-IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development). Sampoerno, 1976, Pemugaran Candi, Pusat Penelitian Purbakala dan Peninggalan Nasional. Jakarta. The Liang Gie, 1976, Garis Besar Estetika (Filsafat Keindahan), Karya Jogjakarta. Cetakan Kedua, Yogyakarta. Amosudiro, Sumijati, 2001, Jawa Tengah: Sebuah Potret Warisan Budaya, Suaka peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Propinsi Jawa Tengah di Prambanan & Jurusan Arkeologi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Univesitas Gadjah Mada. Ismijono, 2003, Tata Cara dan Teknik Pelaksanaan Pemugaran. Jakarta. Parmono Atmadi, 1979, Beberapa Patokan Perancangan Bangunan Candi, Proyek Pelita Pemugaran Candi Borobudur, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. ------------, 1992, Candi Sewu Sejarah dan Pemugarannya, Bagian proyek Pelestarian Peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Jawa Tengah di Prambanan, Yogyakarta. ------------, 1993, Purna Pugaran Candi Sewu, Bagian proyek Pelestarian Peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Jawa Tengah di Prambanan, Yogyakarta. ------------, 2001, Purna Pugaran Candi Sewu, Direktorat Jenderal Sejarah dan Purbakala Departemen Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata, Jakarta. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013. http://australia.icomos.org/wpcontent/ uploads/The-Burra-Charter- 2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf Diakses Tanggal 10 Oktober 2014 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Restoration is done in order to sustain heritage buildings and their information into next
generations, not only in form of stories, but also in form of real constructions. Restoration still
raises some critical issues regarding the cross lines between archeology and architecture. This
study tries to verify main assumption that: during the restoration process of Sewu Temple
(Middle Java-Indonesia), in stone re-installing step, there are some inconsistencies that have
negative impacts on aesthetic main values of the temple. Through library then qualitative
empirical descriptive research, this study ends to a main result that in Sewu Temple restoration
process, there were many inconsistencies in reinstalling new substituter stones, which had
negative implications on architecture aesthetic values. Such negative implications could be
traced to the sculpture process of those new stones, where they were not in accordance either
with archeological or architectural principles. The findings of this study are to call upon more
knowledge integration and professional synergy between archeology and architecture within
restoration projects and teams in future works. | en_US |
