| dc.identifier.citation | Hakima, Muhammad, 1998, Teori-teori Arsitektur, Al-Ba’es University press. Homs. Kostof, Spiro, 1985, A History of Architecture, Oxford University Press. UK. Sampoerno, 1976, Pemugaran Candi, Pusat Penelitian Purbakala dan Peninggalan Nasional. Jakarta. The Liang Gie, 1976, Garis Besar Estetika (Filsafat Keindahan), Karya Jogjakarta. Cetakan Kedua, Yogyakarta. Amosudiro, Sumijati, 2001, Jawa Tengah: Sebuah Potret Warisan Budaya, Suaka peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Propinsi Jawa Tengah di Prambanan & Jurusan Arkeologi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Univesitas Gadjah Mada. Ismijono, 2003, Tata Cara dan Teknik Pelaksanaan Pemugaran. Jakarta. ------------, 1993/1994, Laporan Pemugaran Candi Plaosan Lor, Bagian proyek Pelestarian Peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Jawa Tengah di Prambanan. Yogyakarta. ------------, 1998, Laporan Purna Pugar Candi Plaosan Lor, Suaka peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Propinsi Jawa Tengah di Prambanan. Yogyakarta. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Relics that have historical, architectural, or cultural values, have to be preserved and protected
through conservation and restoration. In the case of stone-made buildings the likeliest problem
is that any mistake or deviation within the restoration process will affect the architectural
values, specially the form values (aesthetic). The purpose of this study is to obtain the best
principles/techniques for the restoration of the stony temple. The restoration of temples as
religious buildings has to match with some principles, which called ‘principles of restoration’.
Restoration process usually consists of six steps. The most ‘be-affected’ aesthetic elements
through such process of restoration are form, and composition. The research paradigm within
the study is rationalistic. A qualitative research is done with a descriptive method. In this study,
the first step is to describe the architecture of the case study, Candi Plaosan Lor. The second
step is to describe and explain the main steps of restoration implementation process. The third
step tries to produce a field observation of the restoration process results, then analyzing the
restoration steps in order to know if the restoration implementation has an impact on the
aesthetic values (form, and set up).The study findings point out that digging, trial set up,
structure reinforcement, and reconstruction affect all studied aesthetic values of temple
buildings while material treatment only affects form and set up (composition). In other hand,
deconstruction is the step that does not affect any aesthetic values of temple building. | en_US |
