| dc.identifier.citation | Bessong, F.E, and Felix Ojong. 2012. Supervision as in Instrument of Teaching- Learning Effectivenes: Chalengge for The Nigerian Practice. Global Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 8 (1 and 2). pp. 15-20 Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. 2007.Education Research: An Introduction. New YorkLondon: Longman. Inc. CicihSutarsih&Nurdin. 2012. SupervisiPendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Day, C. and Judyth Sachs. 2004. International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers. Open University Press. Glasgow. Debling, G. 1995. “The Employment Department Training Agency Standarts Program: Implications for Education”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and training. LondonNew York-Philadelphia: The Farmer Press.pp. 77-94. DirektoratTenagaKependidikan, Ditjen MPMTK Depdiknas. 2007. LaporanUjiKompetensi Guru NasionalTahun 2006. Jakarta: Proyek BERMUTU, PeningkatanKompetensi Guru. Fritz, Cariie. 2003. Supervisory Options for Instructional Leader in Education. Journal of Leadership Education.Vol. 2 (2). pp. 13-27. Guskey, T. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Jones, James J. dan Walters, Donald L. 2008.Human Resources Management in Education (ManajemenSumberDayaManusia ). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Q – Media. Mathis, Robert L. dan Jackson, John H. 200).Human Resources Management (ManajemenSumberDayamanusia). Jakarta: PenerbitSalembaEmpat. Neagley, Ross & Dean Evan. 1980 dalamCicihSutarsihdan Nurdin.2012.SupervisiPendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Samino. 2009. Pengantar Manajemen Pendidikan. Sukoharjo: Fairuz Media Samsudi. 2009. Disain Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang Press. Saud, Udin Saefudin. 2009. PengembanganProfesi Guru.Penerbit: Alfabeta, Bandung. Sugiyono. 2009. MetodePenelitianPendidikan: PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Tayibnapis, Farida Y. 2008. Evaluasi Program dan InstrumenEvaluasiuntuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta : PT. RinekaCipta. ---------------. 2005. UndangUndangRepublik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005. Guru danDosen. Jakarta: Depdiknas. ---------------. 2008. PeraturanPemerintahNomor 74 Tahun 2008.Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Act No. 14/ 2005 about Teachers and Lecturers and PP (Government Decree) No 74/2008
about Teachers give an instruction to the government to certify on-going-occupation teachers of
all courses in requirements. Based on the survey of Directorate General of PMPTK in 2009/,
however, the program of certification couldn’t have developed teachers’ competency and
professionalism significantly so that it does not positively take an effect on teachers’
performance development. The study aims to describe a model of biology teachers’ professional
competency development based on the early competency test (UKA) in Surakarta.The procedure
of research development used R & D model developed by Borg & Gall (2007), and then
simplified by Samsudi (2009; 92) into three main stage: 1) introduction, 2) development, and 3)
validation for finding a model. The introduction of the study empirically analyzed a model of
professional competency development through Biology MGMP, called as factual model
nowadays and theoretically analyzed the relevant researchers. It employed a survey approach
while the instrument was questionnaires. The respondents or informants with purposive
sampling were the heads of LPMP – Provincial Central Java, Education Agency of
Regency/Mayor, Principals, the Committees of Biology MGMP, and Biology Teachers. In the
stage of development, the researcher formulated an early development; then it was analyzed
and matched with the relevant theories for making a model design developed in the form of
Figure or Model Figure after validated through focus group discussion (FGD).The results of
the study stated that a model of biology teachers’ professional competency based on the early
competency test included the following characters: 1) implementing a model began with a
competency test; 2) the activities reflected the aspect of continuing professional development
(CDP); 3) the supervision was periodically realized by principals or course teachers); 4) giving
feed-back for the next development was based on the evaluation; and 5) the speakers of Higher
Education with relevant sciences were involved in the activities. | en_US |
