| dc.identifier.citation | Adnyana, Gede Putra. “Tawuran: Kegagalan Pendidikan Karakter” dalam kompasiana.com. 28 Desember 2011. Diunduh dari http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2011/ 12/28/tawuran-kegagalanpendidikan-karakter/ pada 30 Oktober 2012. Berkowitz, Marvin W. “The Science of Character Education” dalam William Damon (ed.). 2002. Bringing in a New Era in Character Education. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. Damon, William (ed.). 2002. Bringing in a New Era in Character Education. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. Gardner, Roy, Jo Cairns dan Denis Lawton. 2000. Education for Values, Morals, Ethics and Citizenship in Contemporary Teaching. London: Kogan Page. Gordon, Alexa, Madonna M. Murphy, dan Sharon L. Banas. 2009. Character Education: Dealing with Bullying. New York: Chelsea House. Leicester, Mal (ed.). 2000. Moral Education and Pluralism. London: Falmer Press. Lickona, Thomas. 1991. Educating for Character:How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantam Book. Lockwood, A. (1997). Character Education: Controversy and Consensus. London: Corwin Press/Sage. London: Corwin Press/Sage. Nucci, Larry P. dan Darcia Narvaez (eds.). 2008. Handbook of Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Dokumen pdf. Rusnak, T. (ed.). (1998). An Integrated Approach to Character Education. London: Corwin Press. Sporre, Karin dan Jan Mannberg (eds.). 2010. Values, Religions and Education in Changing Societies. Umea: Springer. Stephenson, Joan, Lorraine Ling, Eva Burman, dan Maxine Cooper (eds.). 1998. Values in Education. London: Routledge. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Dokumen pdf. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Dokumen pdf. Sumber Virtual http://berita.plasa.msn.com/nasional/jpnn/taw uran-pelajar-bukti-gagalnyapendidikan-karakter http://danielpasaributest.blogspot.com/2012/10/kekerasan -geng-motor-akibat-gagalnya.html http://forum.kompas.com/nasional/69606penataran-p4-perlu-digelar-lagi.html http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2012/09/26/ 11171546/DPR.Tawuran..Indikasi.G agalnya.Pendidikan.Karakter http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2011/05/23/r evitalisasi-penataran-p4/ http://bisnisjabar.com/index.php/berita/hasyimdjodjohadikusumo-usul-penataranp4-dihidupkan-kembali http://berita.plasa.msn.com/nasional/jpnn/taw | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The study aims at identifying the values treasured in the society considered necessary to be
taught to school children, and finding the priority order of the values.The subjects of the study
were the teachers of Islamic Education (PAI), of Civics Education (PKn), and of GuidanceCounseling
(BK). They were selected purposively from four different secondary schools
representing the variety of the existing schools in the research area. The methods used for
collecting the data were Focused Group Discussion (FGD) and Survey. The main findings of the
study among others were the names, as well as the number of the values, were different from
those identified by the Government, represented by the Center for Curriculum, in Developing
the Education of Culture and Nation Character. The study comes to the following conclusions.
First, there were 20 values treasured in the society and were necessary to be taught to school
children for character formation. As many as six of the twenty values were similar both in
names and descriptions to those identified by the Government as the material for education of
culture and nation character. In addition, there were seven values having different names but
similar descriptions. Second, the subject of the study had different views about the priority
order of the values. They were likely to have similar views on the values placed at the initial and
final levels of the order. The values supposed to be at the middle levels were scattered in such a
way that none reached higher than 20% at the corresponding levels. | en_US |
