Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaryani, Usmi
dc.contributor.authorPrihartanti, Nanik
dc.contributor.authorPrastiti, Wiwien Dinar
dc.contributor.authorLestari, Rini
dc.contributor.authorHertinjung, Wisnu Sri
dc.contributor.authorPrasetyaningrum, Juliani
dc.contributor.authorYuwono, Susatyo
dc.contributor.authorPartini, Partini
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T07:58:10Z
dc.date.available2015-02-02T07:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-24
dc.identifier.citationAiken, L.R. (1985). Tree coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45, 131-142. Azwar, S. (2014). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi, edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009). Wellbeing Research in Developing Countries: Reviewing the Role of Qualitative Methods. Social Indicator Research, 90, 5–31. Creswell, J.W. (2010). Research Design. Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Penerjemah Achmad Fawaid. Jogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective wellbeing: the science of happiness and a proposal for national index. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 34-43. Diener, E. (ed.) (2009a),AssessingWell- Being:TheCollectedWorks of EdDiener, Social Indicators Research Series 39, Dordrecht, Springer. Dodge,R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2 (3), 222-235. Ereaut, G., & Whiting, R. (2008). What do we mean by well-being? And why might it matter?. Research Report DCSFRW073, Linguistic Landscape, Department of Children, Schools & Families, UK. Diunduh 3 April 2013 dari: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8572/1/dcsfrw073% 20v2.pdf. Fraillon, J. (2004). Measuring student wellbeing in context of Australian Schooling: Discussion Paper. Diunduh pada tanggal 12 Januari 2012 dari http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_res ources/Measuring_Student_Well- Being_in_the_Context_of_Australian_Sc hooling.pdf. Fraine, R.D., Landeghem, G.V., Damme, J.V, & Onghena, P. (2005). An analysis of well-being in secondary school with multilevel growth curve models and multilevel multivariate models. Quality & Quantity 39: 297 – 316. Henderson,WW.L., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaemonic perspective to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2 (3). 196-221.. Hertinjung, W.S., & Karyani, U. (2012). Bullying di sekolah dasar. Laporan Penelitian. LPPM UMS. Huebner, E.S., Suldo, S.M., & Valois, R.F. (2003). Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Measures of Children‟s Life Satisfaction: The Students‟ Life Satisfaction Scale and the Brief Multidimensional Students” Life Satisfaction Scale. Paper prepare for the Indicators of Positive Development Conference, March 12 – 13, 2003. Diunduh dari www.childrens.org/files/huenbersuldoval oispaper.pdf. Karyani, U., Prihartanti, N., Prastiti, W.D., Lestari, R., Hertinjung, W.S., Prasetyaningrum, J., Yuwono, S., & Partini. (2014). Wellbeing on child‟s perspectives. Paper presented on The 5th Asian Association of Indigenous and Cultural Psychology, January, 10 – 11 at Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. Konu, A., & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well-being in school: a conceptual model. Health Promotion International, Vo. 17 (1), 79 – 89 Petegem, K.V., Aelterman, A., Keer, H.V., & Rosseel, Y. (2008). The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student‟s wellbeing. Social Indicators Resesearch, 85, 279–291. Pollard, E.L., & Lee, P.D (2003). Child Well-being: A systematic review on the literatur, Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59-78. Prout, S. (2012). Indigenous wellbeing frameworks in Australia and the Quest for Quantification. Social Indicators Research. 109, 317-338. Rees, G., Goswani, H. & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Developing an index of children‟s subjective well being in England. Diunduh pada 12 Maret 2013 dari http://www:childrenssociety.org.uk. Risdaskes. (2013). Riset dasar kesehatan 2013. Diunduh dari: http://depkes.go.id/downloads/riskesdas2 013/Hasil%20Riskesdas%202013.pdf. Ryff, C.D.(1989). Happines is everything or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069-1081. Samman, E. (2007). Psychological & Subjective Well-being: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Pooverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI), Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford. Diunduh dari http://www:ophi.org.UK South Australia Department of Education and Children‟s Service. (2005). Wellbeing is central to learning. Working paper. Dinduh pada 14 Mei 2012 dari http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/learnerwellbe ing Statham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: a brief overview. Briefing Paper 1, Agustus. Childhood wellbeing research centre. London. Diunduh pada tanggal 11 Januari 2012 dari https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads /system/uploads/attachment_data/file/183 197/Child-Wellbeing-Brief. Taylor, D. (2011), „Wellbeing and welfare: a psychosocial analysis of being well and doing well enough. Journal of Social Policy, 40: 4, 777–94. Thomson, S., & Aked, J. (2009). A guid to measuring children‟s wellbeing. New Economic Fundation dan Action For Children. Diunduh dari http://neweconomic.org/. UNICEF. (2012). The Structural Determinants of Child Wellbeing. Research Paper. Diunduh dari pada 26 Oktober 2014 dari http://www.unicefirc. org/publications/pdf/structural_deter m_eng.pdf. Victorian Government. (2010). The Effectiveness of Student Wellbeing Programs and Services. Februari 2010. Victorian Auditor- General‟s Report. Diunduh pada tanggal 20 januari 2013 dari http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/publications /2009-10/290110-Student-Wellbeing- Full-Report.pdf World Health Organization (2001). Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Diunduh dari: http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/index.h tmlen_US
dc.identifier.issn2407 - 9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5134
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to develop an instrument that can be used to measure students wellbeing according to the context of student life. The instruments are arranged in behavioral scale. Item in the scale is based on six aspects of the student’s wellbeing that were identified through indigenous wellbeing framework in a previous study conducted by Karyani, et al (2014). Psychometric methods used to determine the coefficient of content validity and the coefficient of discrimination of items. A total of 11 psychologists and psychometric expert provide an assessment of each item in the instrument to determine the content validity. Scales also tested to 398 junior high school students (M: 210, F: 188), aged between 12-16 years to determine the coefficient of determination of each item. The results of the study showed that the students wellbeing scale that developed in this study consist of 20-item which have a high coefficient of content validity and have a good discrimination coefficient. Distribution of item, coefficients validity and coefficients discrimination of each item are described in detail in this paper.en_US
dc.publisherLPPM UMSen_US
dc.subjectmeasurementen_US
dc.subjectstudenten_US
dc.subjectwellbeingen_US
dc.titlePengembangan Instrumen Pengukuran Kesejahteraan Siswaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record