| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Searle, John R. ”A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts” dalam A.P. Martinich (ed.). 1996. The Philosophy of Language. New York dan Oxford: OUP. 1979. [2] Grice, H.P. ”Logic and Conversation”, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41-58. New York: Academic press. Reprinted in Grice 1989: 22-57. 1975. [3] Macauly, Marcia. ”Tough Talk: Indirectness and Gender in Request for Information”. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (2001) 293-316. www.elsevier. nl/locate/pragma. 2001. [4] Hess-Lüttich.”(Pseudo-) Argumentation in TV-debates”. Journal of Prag-matics 39 (2007) 1360-1370 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pragma. 2007. [5] Purnanto, Dwi. Struktur, Fungsi, dan Penafsiran Makna Pemakaian Bahasa dalam Proses Persidangan Pidana: Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Wilayah Surakarta.Disertasi.UNS. 2009. [6] Clayman, E Steven. ”Address Terms in the Service of Other Actions: the Case of News Interview Talk” in Discourse & Communication 4(2) 161-183. http://dcm.sagepub.com 2010. [7] Amaliah, Farhanah . ”Strategi Bertutur Pemandu Acara dan Narasumber: Sebuah Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Program Dialog Suara Anda Metro”. Skripsi Universitas Indonesia (Tidak Dipublikasikan). 2011. [8] Rosnilawati, Ermanto, danNoviaJuita. ”Tindak Tutur dan strategi Bertutur dalam Pasambahan Maantan Marapulai Pesta Perkawinan di Alahan Panjang Kabupaten Solok”. Skripsi FBS Universitas Negeri Padang (Tidak Diterbitkan). 2013. [9] Wulandari, L. Ayu. ”Strategi Retorika Pembawa Acara dalam Indonesia Lawyers Club di TV ONE”. Skripsi Universitas Jember (Tidak Diterbitkan). 2013. [10] Coulthard, Malcolm. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman Group Limited. 1985. [11] Thomas, Jenny. Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman. 1995. [12] Wijana, I DewaPutu, .Dasar-dasarPragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. 1996. [13] Archer, Dawn. Karin Aijmer. and Anne Wichmann. Pragmatics: An Advanced Resource Book for Students. London & New York: Routledge. 2012. [14] Cutting, Joan. Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge. 2008. [15] Coulthard, Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 1992. [16] Luft, J and Ingham H. The Johari Window: a Graphic Model for Inter personal Relations.(http://www.businessballs.com/ johariwindow model. htm.(05/01/2012 at 12.04). 1955. [17] Ilyas, Karni. 40 Tahun Jadi Wartawan, Karni Ilyas: Lahir untuk Berita. Kompas: Fenty Effendy. 2012. [18] Sinclair and Coulthard. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press. 1975. [19] Tarone, Elaine. Some Thoughts on the Notion of Moderators’s speech strategy. TESOL QUARTELY, Vol. 15. No. 3. September 1981. 1981. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | To reveal information within a discussion, moderator usually implements strategies to leverage the addressee to arouse more responses. This paper aims to investigate moderators’ speech strategies in tvOne discussion, Indonesia Lawyers Club (ILC). The data were utterances during the session of discussion collected by using purposive sampling and the results areten different topics performed onevery Tuesday night from 8 to 11 p.m. in 2012. The technique for analyzing data iscomprehensive analysis referring to pragmatic context both for the strategies of speech act by Searle (1979) and maxims of Cooperative Principles by Grice (1989). The findings show that the most powerful moderators’ speech strategy used to reveal information is directly literal speech act strategy, with the variations of: (1) signaling the adressee with/or without speaking verbally;this signal of non-verbal language is used to show and reveal intimacy; (2) repeating the addressee’s words to show more response to the addressee; (3) using suggestingformula to give respect, especially to addressee with higher status; (4) making counter to ones’ opinions to prove the realinformation;and (5) presenting polite criticism to remark the answer, in which the latter presented less indirectly. | in_ID |
