Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWidowaty, Yeni
dc.contributor.authorFitriyanti, Fadia
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T03:07:56Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T03:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.citationAbdul Gani Abdullah ,2005, “Pandangan Yuridis Conflict of Law dan Choice of Law dalam Kontrak Bisnis Internasional”, Buletin Hukum Perbankan dan Kebanksentralan,ttp, Jakarta” Adi Andojo Setjipto, 2010, Dapatkah Acara Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Digunakan dalam Sengketa Arbitrase, Buletin Triwulan Arbitrase Indonesia, ISSN Nomor 1978- 8398 Nomor 10/2010, Bani, Jakarta Al Fitri, “Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional dan Eksistensinya”, www.badilag.net, Bambang Sutiyoso,2010, Reformasi Keadilan dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, UII Press, Yogyakarta Bambang Sutiyoso, 2012,“Akibat Pemilihan Forum dalam Kontrak yang Memuat Klausula Arbitrase”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 24 Nomor 1 Februari 2012, ISSN 0852-100X, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta I Made Widnyana, 2014, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase, Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta Khoidin, 2013,Hukum Arbitrase Bidang Perdata, CV Aswaja Pressindo, Yogyakarta Maqdir Ismail, 2007, Pengantar Praktek Arbitrase di Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura dan Australia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta Madjedi Hasan,2014, “Ex Aequo Et Bono Decision”, Indonesia Arbitration Quarterly Newsletter, Vol 6 No 4 Desember 2014, ISSN:1978-8398, Bani Arbitration Center, Jakarta Mardani, 2010, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol 29, Nomor 2, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis,Jakarta Mattew B Miles dan A Michael Huberman,1992, Analisis Data Kualitatif, UI Press, Jakarta, Mertokusumo Sudikno, 2004, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2007,Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta Priyatna Abdurrasyid, 2002, Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Fikahati aneska bekerjasama dengan BANI, Jakarta Priyatna Abdurrasyid, 2008, Arbitral Awards, Indonesia Arbitration Quarterly Newsletter, Number 5/2008 , ISSN No. 1978-8398, BANI, Jakarta Rina Sharullah Shariyani, 2012, “Modern Arbitration Legislation: A Comparison between Australian and Indonesian Laws”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol 24, Nomor 2, Juni 2012, ISSN 0852-100X, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta Soekanto Soerjono, 1984, Metode Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta Sudiarto dan Zaeni Asyhadie, 2004, Mengenal Arbitrase Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta Tod, Marcus Niebuhr, 1913, International Arbitration Among The Greeks, The Clarendon Press UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1968 tentang Persetujuan atas Konvensi tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Antarnegara dan Warga Negara Asing Mengenai Penanaman Modal (Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and National of Other States) Keppres Nomor 34 Tahun 1981 tentang Mengesahkan Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 1990 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing Reglement op de Rechtsvordering (Rv) SEMA Nomer 8 Tahun 2008 tentang Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah SEMA Nomer 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Surat Keputusan Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor Kep-09/MUI/XII/2003, tanggal 24 Desember 2003 perubahan nama BAMUI menjadi BASYARNASin_ID
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/6662
dc.description.abstractOne of the advantages of settlement through arbitration in comparison to court, the parties are free to determine which procedural law to be applied. In addition, in Indonesia there are national arbitration also a Sharia arbitration. The objective in this research is the first to examine the dispute settlement procedures of business through BANI and Basyarnas, both reviewing and analyzing comparison BANI business dispute settlement procedure and Basyarnas, third formulate a draft dispute settlement procedure based arbitration to the principles of justice and the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The method used is a normative juridical research and supported juridical empiris. Based on the resultsof this research concludedthat theprocedure ofthe settlement ofbusiness disputesinBANIandBasyarnasneeds to be studied, analyzed andcompared with each other, as it alsoanalyzed usinglegislationregardingarbitration, international conventionsand institutions ofinternational arbitrationtoseekthe concept ofdispute resolution procedureswhichis based onjusticeand thePancasilaandthe 1945 Constitution.From the conceptis expected tobe taken into consideration, literaturematerialsonthe partiesin the context ofa businessdispute settlement procedureinBANIandBasyarnas.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherLPPM STIKES Muhammadiyah Kudusin_ID
dc.subjectThe comparison of business dispute settlementin_ID
dc.subjectBANI and Basyarnasin_ID
dc.titleHarmonisasi Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis pada Bani dan Basyarnasin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record