| dc.identifier.citation | Dit.Jen Bina Marga, 2010, “ Surat Edaran Penyampaian Spesifikasi umum edisi 2010” Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. Girry, 2010, “Karakteristik Daya Dukung Material RAP (Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement) Sebagai Bahan Daur Ulang Perkerasan Jalan”, Surakarta: Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakul tas Teknik, Universi tas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Gor. R. 2005, “Effect of Antistripping Additives on PG Grades of Asphalt” Asphalt Magazine, 38-40. Dybalsky, JN, 1982, “Cationic Surfaction In Asphalt Adhesion”Symposium Anti-Stripping Additives in Paving Mixtures, AAPT Annual Meeting, Kansas Ci ty Missouri. Hartini, A. 2010, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Variasi Antistripping Agent terhadap karakteristik beton aspal lapis aus (AC- WC)”, Universi tas Sumatra Utara, Medan. Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum, 2010, Spesifikasi Umum 2010, Direktorat Jendral Bina Marga. Pamungkas, 2009, “Kajian Uji Kuat Tekan Pada Asphal t Concrete Campuran Panas Dengan RAP”, Surakarta: Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universi tas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Pramudyo, C, 2013, Investigasi Karakteristik RAP(Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement) Artifisial, Tugas Akhir, UMS, Surakarta. Read, J. and Whi teoak, D. 2009. “The shell bitumen handbook”, London, ICE publishing. Setiawan, A.2005, “Pengaruh sulfur terhadap karakteristik perkerasan Ashphal tic Concrete Wearing Course ”. Journal of Transportation Management and Engineering. Sunarjono, S, Riyanto, A, dan Absori . 2012. “RekayasaPemanfaatan Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Untuk Preservasi Konstruksi Jalan”. Jurnal, UMS, Surakarta. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | Pavement recycling or RAP (Reclaimed asphalt pavement) one solution to overcome the problems of the road. The aim of research utilizing waste pavement and modified in order to improve the quality of RAP mixture to be used again. Laboratory test methods for material and aggregate new RAP. The study was conducted preparation of tools and materials, abrasion tests, density, gradation analysis, density analysis, test Dynamic Static immersion test and immersion test Examination using a CBR (California Bearing Ratio) and appliance UTM (Universal Testing Machine). Research made 24 test specimens. Research investigating the physical adhesion properties, the value of CBR and deformation resistance showed good physical adhesion value, bu the new aggregate value better than RAP material, as well as the value of CBR and deformation resistance. Results of static immersion test average of 98.48 RAP, new aggregate 99.87. RAP dynamic testing immersion test average of 97.36, a new aggregate 99.54. RAP test maximum density of 1.64 g / cm3, the optimum water content of 5.1%, the CBR value 32.06, the value of UTM = 33.50. The new aggregate density of 1.74 g / cm3, the optimum water content of 5.6%, the valu
of CBR = 78.50 and the value of UTM = 59.96. RAP deformation testing tool CBR = 0.10 inches (650lb), new aggregate = 0.06 inches (1700lb). RAP deformation testing tool UTM = 0.27 inches (1200lb), new aggregate = 0.12 inches (940lb). research concluded RAP and aggregate new material has good adhesion values but RAP material bearing capacity and deformation values have low quality. | in_ID |
