| dc.identifier.citation | Cole, Peter G. and Chan, Lorna. 1994. Teaching Principles and Practice. Second Edition. New York: Prentice Hall. Cook, Guy. 2003. Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Cottrell, Stella. 2001. Teaching Study Skills and Supporting Learning. New York: Palgrave. Dechant, Emerald V, 1964. Improving the Teaching of Reading. USA: Prentice- Hall, INC. Depdiknas. 2003. Kurikulum 2004: Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP, Madrasah Tsanawiyah, SMA, dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta. Gunter, M. Alice, Thomas H. Estes, Jan Hasbrouck Schwaab. 1990. Instruction: A Model Approach. USA: Allyn aand Bacon. Hamzah, B., Uno, and Sofyan, H. 2004. Landasan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Nurul Jannah” Gorontalo. Hasibuan and Moedjiono. 2003. Proses Belajar dan Mengajar (PBM). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Heaton, J. B. 1975. Writing English Language Tests. A Practical Guide for Teachers of English as a Second or Foreign Language. London: Longman Group Limited. Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. 1987. English for specific purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Idi, Abdullah. 2007. Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Jogjakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA. Kasbollah, K. 1993. Teaching Using Strategy I. Instructional Materials. Malang: FPBS IKIP Malang. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Second edition. Sage. Montague, E. J. 1987. Fundamentals of Secondary Classroom Instruction. Columbus, Ohio: Merril Publishing Company. Pincas, Anita. 1982. Teaching English Writing. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Richards, Jack; John Platt; and Heidi Weber. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. England: Longman Group Limited. Richards, J. C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tarigan, Djogo and Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1987. Teknik Pengajaran Ketrampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa. Tomlinson, Brian. 1998. Materials Development in Language Teaching. New york: Cambridge University Press. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | Writing lecturer has no enough knowledge as to the writing material development. He is usually as a writing material provider, not a writing material developer. This study is aimed at describing the weaknesses and the strengths of the writing materials used at the beginning semester of University of ex-Karesidenan Surakarta. The data are the teaching materials of writing used at it; collected by the document analysis, observation, and interview; and the step of analysis is data collection, data
reduction, data display, and conclusion. The research result is that writing materials at the one of UMS belong to the point chosen from writing skill, belong to the writing skills, writing skill is learned after reading skill, and cannot be the base for learning the ones in the next semester; the ones at UNS can be the base for it, do not belong to the point chosen from it, some of which do not belong to them, and it is learned before it; and the ones at UNIVET, UNISRI and UNWIDA belong
to the point chosen from it, cannot be the base for it, some of which do not belong to them, and it is learned before it. | in_ID |
