Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIndarto, Indarto
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-29T04:13:03Z
dc.date.available2016-02-29T04:13:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier.citationAlsop,R.Hensohn,N.2005.MeasuringEmpower ment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framin Indicators.World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 3510.Washingtom Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. Vol. 17 No.1. pp. 99-120 Denison D.R. & Mishra, A.K. 1995. Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204-227. Ferdinand, Augusty. 2005 . Structural Equation Modelling Perspektif Penelitian Manajemen, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Ghozali, I. 2011. Model Persamaan Struktural:Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS Ver.16.Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang Hameed, Imran. 2009. Sources of Business Competitive Advantage: A Review. Journal of Business & Economics. July-December. Pp. 222-233 Kettunen, P. 2002. Strengthening the Competitive Edge of SMEs through New Regional andLocal Measures. www.igw.Unisg.ch/rencontres/ban d2002/D_05_Kettunen.pdf . Diakses Oktober 2011. Kocel T 2003. Business Management. Istanbul: Beta Publishing. Lopez, S.P., Peon, J.M.M. and Ordas, C.J.V. 2004, ‘‘Managing knowledge: the link between culture and organizational learning’’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 93-104. Margaret Erstad. 1997 "Empowerment and organizational change", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 9 Iss: 7, pp.325 – 333 Mutunga Laititi Stephen.2014. Innovative Adaptation Anda Operational Efficiency On Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Food And Beverage Firms In Kenya. European Journal of Business and Innovation research. Vol. 2.NO.2.32-50 Notoatmodjo, S., 2003. Pendidikan Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York Asmarani, Dinda Estika. 2006. Reguia, Cherroun. 2014.Product Innovation And Competitive Advantage.European Scientific Journal.Vol.1.ISSN:1857- 7881 Tamaya, Vicka, Susi Sulandari, Dyah Lituhayu.2013. Optimalisasi Kampung Batik Dalam Mengembangkan Industri Batik Semarangan di Kota Semarang.Diakses 27 April 2014. Toffler, Alvin (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House. p. 367 Zalabak, P. S., and E. K. Winograd G. 2000. ‘Organizational Trust: What It Means, Why It Matters.’ Organization Developmental Journal 18 (4): 35–49.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/6879
dc.description.abstractBatik Semarangan SMEs are required to increase their competitive advantage along with the revival of batik industry in various regions and the entry into force of the Economic Asean Community and global free market. This study examined the role of innovation and partnership in improving the competitive advantage of Batik Semarangan SMEs. Data used in the study is primary data which is obtained through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The population were entrepreneurs and craftmen in Batik Semarangan SMEs. The result of descriptive analysis shows that entrepreneurs and craftsmen Batik Semarangan growing well, judging from the number and product development. The entrepreneurs and craftsmen Batik Semarangan understand the importance of improving the competitive advantage of Batik Semarangan. Depth interview and observations‘s results demonstrate that Batik Semarangan SMEs have to innovate although there are still many obstacles, but quite succses. The perpetrators in SMEs Batik Semarangan had to develop creativity, confidence and empowerment in fostering innovation and partnerships. But this time Batik Semarangan SMEs is still lacking in partnership, so marketing Batik Semarangan still limited. To examine the role of innovation and partnership on competitive advantage of SMEs Batik Semarangan used analysis Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results are ; empowerment have positif relationship to partnership ; creatifity and adaptability have positive relationship to innovation; partnership has positive relationship to innovation; innovation has positive relationship to competitive advantage. Unfortunately, trust has no effect to partnership; partnership has no affect to competitive advantage.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherLPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarangin_ID
dc.subjectcompetitive advantagein_ID
dc.subjectinnovationin_ID
dc.subjectpartnershipsin_ID
dc.subjectSMEsin_ID
dc.titlePeran Inovasi dan Kemitraan dalam Meningkatkan Keunggulan Bersaing UMKM Batik Semaranganin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record