Comparison of Fracture Resistance between Prefabricated and Fabricated Fiber Reinforced Post Systems on Different Post Canal Width
| dc.contributor.author | Widyastuti, Noor Hafida | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hadriyanto, Wignyo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mulyawati, Ema | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-05T01:18:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-05T01:18:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Nam, S.H., Chang, H.S., Min, K.S., Lee, Y., Cho, H.W., and Bae, J.M., 2010, Effect of the Number of Residual Walls on Fracture Resistances, Failure Patterns, and Photoelasticity of Simulated Premolars Restored with or without Fiber Reinforced Composte Posts, J Endod, 36, 297-301 2. Newman, M.P., Yaman, P., Dennison, J., Rafter, M., dan Billy, E., 2003, Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Composite Post, J Prosth Dent, 89, 360-7 3. Cheung W., 2005, A Review of The Management of Endodontically Treated Teeth. JADA, 5, 611-619 4. Akkkayan, B., and Gulmez,T., 2002, Resistance to Fracture of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different post Systems, J Prosth Dent, 87, 431-7 5. Sedgley, C.M., and Messer, H.H., 1992, Are Endodontically Treated Teeth more Brittle?, J Endod, 18, 332-334 6. Ferrari, M., Breschi, L., and Grandini, S., 2008, Fiber Post and Endodontically Treated Teeth, MDM, Wendywood, h. 39-163 7. Karbhari, V.M., and Strassler, H., 2007, Effect of Fiber Architecture on Fleksural Characteristics and Fracture of Fiber-Reinforced Dental Composite, Den Mat, 23, 960-8 8. Le Bell, A.M., Ronnlof, 2007, Fibre Reinforced composite as root canal post, Medica Odontologica, http://oa.doria.fi/handle/10024/33576 9. Papadogiannis, D., Lakes, R.S, Palaghias, G., and Papadogiannis Y., 2009, Creep and Dynamic Viscoelastic Behavior of Endodontic Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts, J. Prosth Dent, 53: 185-192 10. Seefeld, F., Wenz, H.Z., Ludwig, K., Kern, M., 2007, Resistance to Fracture and Structural Characteristics of Different Fiber Reinforced Post Systems, Dent Mat, 23, 265-71 | in_ID |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2477-3328 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/7472 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Endodontic treated teeth are more susceptible to fracture. Correct restoration can minimize fracture risk, for example crown and post-core systems. Based on its manufacturing, Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) Post was divided into prefabricated and fabricated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences of fracture resistance between Prefabricated and Fabricated FRC Post systems on different post canal width. Method: The samples of this study were 28 premolars that were cut with 15 mm in length. The samples were treated with conventional endodontic method using gutta percha and resin sealer. The samples were divided into two groups and two sub-groups. The first two group was based on canal width consisting of 14 teeth each group with two different canal width (1.4 mm and 2.1 mm). Then, the first group was divided again into two subgroups based on the dowel use (Prefabricated post and Fabricated Post). Universal Testing machine was used to test the samples resistance. Result: This research showed that there were differences in fracture resistance on different post canal width. However, there were no fracture resistance differences between prefabricated post and fabricated post. | in_ID |
| dc.language.iso | en | in_ID |
| dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | in_ID |
| dc.subject | post canal width | in_ID |
| dc.subject | prefabricated FRC post | in_ID |
| dc.subject | fabricated FRC post | in_ID |
| dc.subject | fracture resistance | in_ID |
| dc.title | Comparison of Fracture Resistance between Prefabricated and Fabricated Fiber Reinforced Post Systems on Different Post Canal Width | in_ID |
| dc.type | Article | in_ID |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
ISETH 2016 (The 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Innovation for Humanity