| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. Eric Zhi-Feng, Yi Chin Zhuo, dan Shyan-Ming Yuan. 2004. “Assessing Higher Order Thinking Using a Networked Portfolio System with Perr Assesment. International Journal of Instructional Media 31 (2) page 139-149. Hellsten, Laurie-ann. 2010. “Critical Thinking Education and Assessment: Can Higher Order Thinking Be Tested?”. Canadian Journal of Education 33 (3) 652 – 656. Istiyono, Edi, Mardapi, Djemari, Suparno. (2014). “Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PsysTHOTs) Peserta Didik SMA”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 18 (1) 1-12. Nitko, A.J & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2001). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE. ___________________. (2010). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Pusat Kurikulum Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Depdiknas. (2006). Model Penilaian Kelas Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Setiawan, Harianto, Dafik, dan Lestari, N.D.S. 2014. “Soal Matematika Dalam PISA Kaitannya dengan Literasi Matematika dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Universitas Jember, 19 November 2014 halaman 244-251. Shouhong Wang & Hai Wang. (2012). “Organizational Schemata of E-Portfolios for Fostering Higher-Order Thinking”. Inf Syst Front 14:395–407. Soleimani, H. Dan Kheiri, S. (2016).”An Evaluation of TEFL Postgraduates’ Testing Classroom Activities and Assignments Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 861-869, April 2016. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The mid- and final-semester examinations are part of the lecturing evaluation. The
evaluation technique used for assessing the students’ competency is usually based on a test. As an
assessment, the test can be developed in the subjective and objective types, but each type has different
characteristics. It can be useful for assessing the critical thinking students’ who not only memorize and
understand the materials of the test. The research paper aims to describe a development strategy of
instrument test assessment of the critical thinking students. It is the introductory study result of the midsemester
examination
for Learning Evaluation course. Based on the identification of questions, answer
sheet, and students’ responses when evaluating the peer-students, it is stated that the instrument test
development can be helpful for assessing the critical thinking students’ answers. It is proved that there
were the heterogeneous answers based on the scheme that was a cheat-on-exam result for their friends
and books. | in_ID |
