Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQomarun, Q
dc.contributor.authorRonald, Arya
dc.contributor.authorTaufik, T
dc.contributor.authorAzizah, Ronim
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-23T02:55:03Z
dc.date.available2017-02-23T02:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2009-12
dc.identifier.citationAmbary, H. M. (1999). Stage of history: Dedicated to Prof Lombard. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor. (in Indonesian.) Bappeda. (2006). Urban planning of Surakarta, 2007- 2016. Surakarta: Bappeda Press. (in Indonesian.) Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. New York: Prentice Hall. Carr, John E. (1985). Ethno-behaviorism and the culture- bound of syndrome: The case of Amok, culture, medicine, and psychiatry. Berkley, CA: University California Press. Carey, P. (1976a). Mataram and ts successors: 1600- 1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carey, P. (1976b). The origin of Java War, 1825-1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Case and class conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Galtung, J. (1982). The true world: A transnational perspective. New York: The Free Press. Google Earth. (2009). Map of Solo city and surrounding area. Retreived 17, December, 2009, from http:// www.google.com Graaf, H. J. de. (1954). De Regering van Panembahan Senapati Ingalaga. Jakarta: Pustaka Grafitipers. (in Indonesian.) Graaf, H. J. de. (1961). De Regering van Sunan Mangku- Rat I Tegal-Wangi, vorst van Mataram, 646-1677: De Ontbinding van Het Rijk. Jakarta: Pustaka Grafitiper . (in Indonesian.) Graaf, H. J. de. (1958). De Regering van Sultan Agung. Vorst van Mataram,1613-1645, en Die van Zijn. Voorganger Panembahan Seda-ing Krapjak, 1601- 1613. Jakarta: Pustaka Grafitipers. (in Indonesian.) Houben, V. J. H. (2002). Keraton and Kumpeni: Surakarta and Yogyakarta, 1830-1870. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya. (in Indonesian.) Kartodirdjo. (1975). The Indonesian history 1-111. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (in Indonesian. ) KlTLV (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies at Leiden) (2009). Image database. Retreived December 10,2009, from http:// www.kitlv.nl/ Klinken, G. van. (2007). Communal violence and democratization in Indnesia: Small town wars. ew York: Routledge. (in Indonesian.) Kraepelin, E. (1976). Comparative psychiatry. Bristol: 1. Wright. Lombard, D. (2005). Java Island (lst-3rd Volume). Jakarta: Gramedia. (in Indonesian.) Muhadjir, N. (1996). Qualitative research method. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin. (in Indonesian.) Muljana, S. (1968). The rise and fall of Javanese Kingdom in XV century. Jakarta: Bhratara. (in Indonesian.) Nas, P. J. M. (1986). The Indonesian city. New York: Foris. Ngadijo. (1993). The history of Keraton Surakarta. Surakarta: Tiga Serangkai. (in Javanese.) Nurhadiantomo. (2004). Social conflicts: The social justice of Law. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. Olthof, W.L. (1941). The history of Java I land. Yogyakarta: Narasi Press. (in Indonesian.) Pruin, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). The theory of social conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill. (in Indonesian.) Qomarun. (2007). Morphology of Solo, 1500-2000. Surabaya: Petra University Press. (in Indonesian.) Reid. (1998). Indonesian heritage. Jakarta: Buku Antar Bangsa. (in Indonesian.) Raffles, T. S. (1817). The history of Java. London: Oxford University Press. Ricklefs, M. C. (2005). The history of modern Indonesia. Yogyakarta: GMU Press. (in Indonesian.) Sajid. (1984). The history of Sala. Surakarta: Rekso Pustaka. (in Javanese.) Shanta. (1998). The History of Pajang. Surakarta: Sasana Pustaka. (in Javanese.) Solopos. (2008). Ten Years 'Gray May' Riot: The Raise of Solo. Surakarta: Solopos Press. (In Indonesian.)in_ID
dc.identifier.issn1883-647X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/8197
dc.description.abstractThe background of the study is a highly frequency of mass amok phenomenon in Solo City in the last several decades. Exploring the urban social disaster, this study observed the development of Solo City during 1740 to 2000. The purpose of this research is not only to explore the urban space damaged, but also to clarify the main formula of urban social disaster. The research is approached by rationalistic paradigm; while the method of study is conducted by the historical-archeology. This study finds that there are 26 accidents within 1-12 scale range of Urban Space Damaged (USD) during 1740-2000. The other finding is the main formula of urban social disaster as: (fm) = (f 1 ) + (f t ), The study shows that the bigger latent conflict (f ) occurs, the easier manifest conflict (fm) happens; while the urban social disaster is always in need of a trigger (f 1 1 ). However, this study finds that the urban social disaster appears approximately every 10 years; while the victims of every accident are always seem in the collapse buildings, the dying people and the chaotic environment. Therefore, the urban spaces of Solo City usually have a setback period. According to the serial data, the main factors of latent conflicts (f ) are conducted by economic-disparity, social-leaderless and hypocrite-culture; while the several triggers (f t 1 ) are conducted by the activity of socio-politic, socio-economic and socio-culture. The study has yet to find the indicator and parameter of each factor's formula so that this study suggests taking the advance research related to the detail formula of urban social disaster.in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherInternational Society of Habitat Engineeringin_ID
dc.subjectAmokin_ID
dc.subjectSoloin_ID
dc.subjectUrban social disasterin_ID
dc.subjectUrban space damagedin_ID
dc.titleUrban Social Disaster: A Case Study of Solo City during 1740-2000in_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record