Show simple item record

Metode Usulan Untuk Analisis Sensitifitas Dalam Pemilihan Pemasok

dc.contributor.authorRistono, Agus
dc.contributor.authorPratikto
dc.contributor.authorSantoso, Purnomo Budi
dc.contributor.authorTama, Ishardita Pambudi
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T01:22:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T01:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-22
dc.identifier.citationChai, J., Liu, J. N. K., and Ngai, E. W. T., 2013, Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 40, No. 10, 3872–3885,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040. Ertay, T., Kahveci, A., and Tabanlı, R. M., 2011, An integrated multi-criteria group decisionmaking approach to efficient supplier selection and clustering using fuzzy preference relations, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, No. 12, 1152-1167,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.615342. Freeman, J. and Chen, T., 2015, Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, 327 – 340,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2014-0142. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., and Murugesan, P., 2015, Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 98, 66 – 83,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046. Ho, W., Xu, X., and Dey, P. K., 2010, Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 202, No. 1, 16–24,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009. Pitchipoo, P., Ponnusamy, V., and Sivaprakasam, R., 2013, Modeling and development of a decision support system for supplier selection in the process industry, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, Vol. 9, 1 - 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-712X-9-23. Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P. and Rajakarunakaran, S., 2012, A distinct decision model for the evaluation and selection of a supplier for a chemical processing industry, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 50, No. 16, 4635 – 4648,: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.624560. Polat, G., 2015, Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.948910 Pramanik, D., Haldar, A., Mondal, S. C., Naskar, S. K., and Ray, A., 2016, Resilient supplier selection using AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2015.1101719. Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., and Schultmann, F., 2015, Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 Zolfani, S. H., Chen, I. S., Rezaeiniya, N., and Tamošaitienė, J., 2012, A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 529 – 543,: http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.709472.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2337-4349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/8618
dc.description.abstractSelection of suppliers is to determine the best supplier based on several criteria that are important to the company. Therefore, the selection of suppliers is the problem of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). Current research trends are combining two or more methods of MCDM in the selection of suppliers. However, the coalition does not necessarily produce a better model. A good model in the supplier selection is not sensitive to changes in criteria weights. Many studies, such as Polat (2015), Pitchipoo et al. (2013) and others, make changes to the weighting of criteria not based on real conditions. This study proposes a new way to perform a sensitivity analysis on the model of supplier selection. The proposed method will prove that the conclusions of previous research in the supplier selection (Polat, 2015; Pitchipoo et al. (2013)) which combines two MCDM is not necessarily better than just one MCDM only.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectcriteriain_ID
dc.subjectsensitivity analysisin_ID
dc.subjectmulti-criteria decision makingin_ID
dc.subjectsupplier selectionin_ID
dc.titleMetode Usulan Untuk Analisis Sensitifitas Dalam Pemilihan Pemasokin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
IENACO 099.pdf
Size:
761.3Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record