Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYuliana, Irma
dc.contributor.authorSukirman, S
dc.contributor.authorSujalwo, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-22T07:22:05Z
dc.date.available2018-03-22T07:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.issn2477-3328
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9659
dc.description.abstractThe study of social network analysis depends on the relationships of people and online community. The relationships define who they are and how they act. Personality, educational background, race, and ethnicity, all of these interact with the patterns of relationship. Thus, by observing and analyzing such patterns, people can reveal and answer many questions about society. The relationship can be visualized in many ways, e.g. online community. Fruchterman-Reingold is a standard method force-directed algorithm or spring embedders place vertices by assigning forces according to the edges connecting the vertices. Meanwhile, Wakita-Tsurumi is a clustering algorithm used for cluster detection. It uses the metric of modularity (Q) as a quality measure of division in a network, based on the idea that networks with inherent community structure deviate from random networks and that networks with high modularity have denser connections inside a community, but fewer connections between nodes of different communities. The comparison shows the ability of both techniques to recognize the community based on sociometric and its contents. Both of the graph detected the same number of vertices (363), edges (5814) and density (0.02975511).id_ID
dc.language.isoenid_ID
dc.publisherProceedings of ISETH 2017 (The 3rd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Humanity)id_ID
dc.titleA Comparison of Community Clustering Techniques: Fruchterman-Reingold and Wakita-Tsurumiid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record