Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWiratno, Tri
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-07T02:27:04Z
dc.date.available2018-06-07T02:27:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.citationAnthony, E. M. (1963). Approach, method and technique, English Language Teaching 17, pp. 63-67. Adger, C.T., & Wright, L.J. (2015). Discourse in educational settings. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., & Schiffrin, D., Eds., The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd Ed). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Baker, P., & Ellece, S. (2011). Key terms in discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum. Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London & New York: Routledge. Bloor, T. (2005). Grammar of modern English: Unit 1 Fundamental issues [http://www. philselfsupport.com/grammar_issues.htm], retrieved 4/5/2008. Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English (2 nd Ed). London: Arnold. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Christie, F. (2002). Clasroom discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum. Christie, F. (1989). Curriculum genres in early childhood education: A case study in writing development (PhD thesis), Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney. Christie, F., & Martin, J.R., Eds. (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London & New York: Continuum. Depdiknas. (2003a). Kurikulum 2004 standar kompetensi mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, Balitbang, Depdiknas. Depdiknas. (2003b). Kurikulum 2004 standar kompetensi mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, Balitbang, Depdiknas. Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In Sidnell, J., & Strivers, T., Eds., Handbook of Conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. Antipodean Educational Enterprises. Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar, Word, 17(3), pp. 241-292. Halliday, M.A.K. (1965). Speech and situation, Bulletin of the National Association for the Teaching of English: Some Aspects of Oracy, 2(2), pp. 14-17. Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Language structure and language functions. In Lyons, J.J., Ed., New Horisons in linguistics. Halliday, M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social- semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press. Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Education. Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014) Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. London & New York: Routledge. Halliday, M.A.K., McIntosh, & Streven, P. (1965). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman. Hamid, Z. (1999). Sistem politik Australia. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (2009). Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In Hyland, K., & Diani, G., Eds., Academic evaluation review genres in university settings. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Hyland, K., & Paltridge, B., Eds. (2011). Continuum companion to discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum. Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J.J., & Hymes, D., Eds., Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston, Inc. Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL, TESOL Quarterly, 30 (4), pp. 693- 722. Knain, E. (2015). Scientific literacy for participation: A systemic functional approach to analysis of school science discourses. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Lock, G., & Jones, R. (2011). Functional grammar in the ESL classroom. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Markee, N., Ed. (2015). The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell. Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press. Martin, J.R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Martin, J.R. (1996). Types of structure: Deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text. In Hovy, E.H., & Scott, D.R., Eds., Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues– An Interdisciplinary Account. Heidelberg: Springer. Martin, J.R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In Christie, F., & Martin, J.R., Eds., Genre and institution: Social processes in the workplace and school. London & New York: Continuum. Martin, J.R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective, Linguistics and Education, 20, pp. 10-21. Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2003/2007). Working with discourse. London: Continuum. Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox. Martin, J.R., & Veel, R., Eds. (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional perspective on the discourse of science. London & New York: Routledge. Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1992). Lexicogramatical Cartography: Englsih System (Draft). Sydney: University of Sydney. [Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1995). Lexicogramatical cartography: Englsih system. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers]. O’Halloran, K. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London & New York: Continuum. Parodi, G. (2010). Academic and professional discourse genres in Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambride University Press. Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4 th Ed.). Harlow: Longman. Rymes, B. (2008). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Rose, D., & Martin, J.R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn. London: Equinox. Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., & Schiffrin, D., Eds. (2015). The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd Ed). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wilkins, D.A. (1976). Notional syllabusess: A taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curriculum development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wiratno, T. (1995). Mengajarkan ‘English skills’ secara integratif dengan mengunakan ‘Genre-Based Approach’, MIBAS, 13/VI. Wiratno, T. (2001). Construction and deconstruction in teaching writing. Paper presented in Network of University ELT Service Providers National Conference, Institut Teknologi Surabaya, 30-31 August 2001. Wiratno, T. (2002). Mencerna Buku Teks Bahasa Inggris melalui Pemahaman Gramatika. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Wiratno, T. (2003a). Text deconstruction in English language teaching. Paper presented in The 2 International Seminar of English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, 5-6 May, 2003. Wiratno, T. (2003b). Kiat menulis karya ilmiah dalam bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Wiratno, T. (2009). Makna metafungsional teks ilmiah dalam bahasa Indonesia pada jurnal ilmiah: Sebuah analisis sistemik fungsional (Dissertation). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Wiratno, T. (2013). Penbelajaran bahasa berbasis teks dan jenis-jenis teks. Paper presented in Sosialisasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, Bogor, 22-25 August 2013. Wiratno, T. (2014a). Struktur teks dan hubungan genre pada teks ilmiah dalam bahasa Indonesia. Paper presented in Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, 19-22 February 2014. Wiratno, T. (2014b). Kajian teks berkaitan dengan Kurikulum 2013. Paper presented in Seminar Nasional Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Penghela Ilmu Pengetahuan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, 5 November 2014. Wiratno, T. (forthcoming). Pengantar ringkas linguistik sistemik fungsional. Wiratno, T., Purnanto, D., & Damaianti, V.S. (2014). Bahasa Indonesia: Ekspresi diri dan akademik. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Young, L. & Harrison, C., Eds. (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Studies in social change. London & New York: Continuumid_ID
dc.identifier.issn2621-1661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9956
dc.description.abstractLinguistik Sistemik Fungsional (LSF) telah lama dijadikan landasan filosofis pengembangan kurikulum dan materi ajar bahasa. Atas dasar teori genre di bawah kerangka LSF, juga dirumuskan pendekatan mengajar yang disebut Genre Based Approach atau Pembelajaran Berbasis Teks. Materi ajar yang digunakan pada pendekatan tersebut adalah teks dalam berbagai jenis. Kurikulum yang dikembangkan diarahkan pada penciptaan teks oleh pembelajar dan cara memanfaatkan teks tersebut pada konteks sosial-budaya yang melingkupinya.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherSeminar Nasional Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (SEMNAS KBSP) IV 2016id_ID
dc.titlePengembangan Kurikulum dan Materi Ajar Berbasis Linguistik Sistemik Fungsionalid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record